
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">According to reports by the NY Post, a new CIA review of the Obama administration’s spy agencies&#8217; assessment that Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election to help Donald Trump was deliberately corrupted by then-CIA Director John Brennan, FBI Director James Comey, and Director of National Intelligence James Clapper. The bombshell review says the three Obama-era officials were “excessively involved” in drafting the original allegation of &#8220;collusion&#8221; and rushed its completion in a &#8220;chaotic,&#8221; &#8220;atypical,&#8221; and &#8220;markedly unconventional&#8221; process, which raised questions of a &#8220;potential political motive.&#8221;</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Further, Brennan’s decision to include the discredited Steele dossier, over the objections of the CIA’s most senior Russia experts, “undermined the credibility” of the assessment.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The “Tradecraft Review of the 2016 Intelligence Community Assessment [ICA] on Russian Election Interference” was conducted by career professionals at the CIA’s Directorate of Analysis and was commissioned by current CIA Director John Ratcliffe back in May of this year.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ratcliff’s “lessons-learned review” ;found that, on December 6, 2016, six weeks before his presidency ended, Barack Obama ordered the assessment, which concluded that Russian President Vladimir Putin “aspired” to help Trump win the election. ;</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The review identified “multiple procedural anomalies” that undermined the credibility of the ICA, including “a highly compressed production timeline, stringent compartmentation, and excessive involvement of agency heads.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It also questioned the exclusion of key intelligence agencies and said media leaks may have influenced analysts to conform to a false narrative of Trump-Russia collusion.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The rushed timeline to publish both classified and unclassified versions before the presidential transition raised questions about a potential political motive behind the White House tasking and timeline.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The review found that Brennan directed the compilation of the ICA and that his, Comey&#8217;s, and Clapper&#8217;s &#8220;direct engagement in the ICA’s development was highly unusual in both scope and intensity” and ”risked stifling analytic debate.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Brennan handpicked the CIA analysts to compile the ICA and involved only the ODNI, CIA, FBI, and NSA, excluding 13 of the then-17 intelligence agencies.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">He sidelined the National Intelligence Council and forced the inclusion of the discredited Steele dossier despite objections of the authors and senior CIA Russia experts so as to push a false narrative that Russia secured Trump’s 2016 victory.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">&#8220;This was Obama, Comey, Clapper, and Brennan deciding, &#8216;We&#8217;re going to screw Trump,'&#8221; said Ratcliffe speaking to the Post in an exclusive interview. ;</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“It was, ‘We’re going to create this and put the imprimatur of an IC assessment in a way that nobody can question it.’ They stamped it as Russian collusion and then classified it so nobody could see it.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ratcliff added that the &#8220;direct engagement&#8221; of agency heads Brennan, Comey, and Clapper in the ICA’s development was “highly unusual in both scope and intensity. This exceptional level of senior involvement likely influenced participants, altered normal review processes, and ultimately compromised analytic rigor.</p>

New Report Obama’s CIA “Trump-Russia” Connection Was Corrupt from the Start
