Site icon The Punching Bag Post

Manchin and Sinema should kill the Reconciliation Bill

&NewLine;<p>West Virginia Senator Joe Manchin has two problems with President Biden’s &dollar;3&period;5 trillion dollar Reconciliation Bill&period;&nbsp&semi; First is the total cost &&num;8212&semi; and secondly the provisions in the Bill he will not support&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Arizona Senator Krysten Sinema has not detailed all her oppositions to the big Bill&period;&nbsp&semi; She does not like the size but has not been as specific as Manchin in indicating what her ceiling is or which provisions she will not support&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Manchin had notified Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer early on that he would not support a bill in excess of &dollar;1&period;5 trillion&period;&nbsp&semi; That has led to Washington-style speculation that a final compromise Bill would be in the &dollar;2&period;0 to &dollar;2&period;5 trillion range&period;&nbsp&semi; Manchin will come up from his ceiling&comma; they assume&period;&nbsp&semi; But maybe not&period;&nbsp&semi; So far&comma; he is sticking to his &dollar;1&period;5 trillion number&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>This has put Vermont’s Socialist Senator Bernie Sanders into a frenzy&period;&nbsp&semi; And why not&quest;&nbsp&semi; Sanders has wanted a &dollar;6 trillion package&period;&nbsp&semi; He considered the &dollar;3&period;5 trillion Bill as a final compromise&period;&nbsp&semi; On the other hand&comma; Manchin may see his &dollar;1&period;5 trillion as a compromise from his initial position that only the bi-partisan physical Infrastructure Bill should be passed this year&period;&nbsp&semi;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Manchin proposed that the bigger Bill should be put on pause and not even considered until next year&period;&nbsp&semi; He said that Congress should wait until we can ascertain the effects of the initial &dollar;1&period;9 trillion Stimulus Bill that passed in January – and until the backlog of unspent money gets into the economy&period;&nbsp&semi; His point is well taken&period;&nbsp&semi; If Biden got all his proposals through Congress&comma; that would be an expenditure of &dollar;6&period;4 trillion over the next ten years – and a lot more fuel to the inflation that is already raging&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>It is only the astronomically high cost of the initial proposals that makes Manchin’s &dollar;1&period;5 trillion line-in-the-sand reasonable&period;&nbsp&semi; It is not&period;&nbsp&semi; It is still too much money spent for too many wrong reasons&period;&nbsp&semi;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>On the other hand&comma; a &dollar;1&period;5 trillion package is a defeat for the Biden and the Progressives agenda&period;&nbsp&semi; Oh&comma; they will call it a great victory&comma; but losing more than half of his proposal – and some of the core programs – is more of a defeat than a victory&period;&nbsp&semi; But it still gives Biden too much&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>So&comma; there &OpenCurlyQuote;tis&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;

Exit mobile version