Select Page

Los Angeles: To Keep Rents Low, Make Owners Sell their Buildings to the City

Los Angeles: To Keep Rents Low, Make Owners Sell their  Buildings to the City
Help remove stubborn mature fat cells

As part of a strategy to keep rents affordable in Los Angeles, City Councilman Gil Cedillo is trying to force landlord Thomas Botz to sell his 124-unit apartment building.

“We will use all of the resources of the city, both legal and fiscal, to protect these tenants,” argues Cedillo. “The city is in crisis…with respect to housing and affordability.”

The building, known as Hillside Villa, was constructed in 1986 using nearly $5.5 million in loans from the city. In exchange, developers promised to keep rents at affordable prices for the next 30 years. That agreement expired in 2018.

A Punching Bag Post Exclusive Offer

The next ICONIC MUGIt’s Winning Season Again…Buy Now!

“If the city goes and expropriates buildings from private developers like us, who have made their 30-year deal…just to have the building taken away at the end, no private developer would build another unit of housing in cooperation with the city of LA ever again,” argues Botz, who rejected a proposal from Cedillo last year. 

Now, Cedillo hopes to acquire the building using the LA Board of Public Works’ power of eminent domain.

The Board of Public Works has long used eminent domain to buy private property for public infrastructure projects such as schools, bridges, and fire stations. The city’s housing department lacks this authority, however, and Cedillo will need to prove that he can legally force Mr. Botz to sell Hillside Villa to preserve affordable rent. If he succeeds, the city will need to pay fair market value for the building – a price that could take years in court to determine. 

If Cedillo fails to obtain Hillside Villa, tenants will face rent increases of up to 50% later this year. In at least one unit, monthly rent is expected to jump from $889 to $2,500.

Cedillo has broad support from tenant rights groups, who insist the acquisition of existing buildings is a better way to prevent homelessness than building affordable housing from scratch.

Author’s Note:

Housing and homelessness are real problems in California, but forcing landowners to sell their apartment buildings is not the answer, nor is it legal.

Cedillo’s proposal is actual socialism: the forced sale of private property to a city for the city’s own purposes, the assumption by government of the means of production.

This is not the same thing as eminent domain, wherein land is purchased for projects in the public right of way, but an attempt to compete with private industry. If Cedillo is successful, we can expect the city to establish a price advantage for the next forced sale, and the next, until the city eventually takes whatever property it wants without paying landlords a dime.

Editor’s Note:

California’s propensity to socialism is not the solution to this problem, it is the actual cause of the problem. California may find that if it leaves the free market alone and focuses on its own responsibilities which are infrastructure needs, that the housing industry would balance itself out and many problems would solve themselves.

As for attacking a building owner who has lived up to his agreements? The building owner should sue the city’s butts off.

 

About The Author

7 Comments

  1. James P Andrews

    Theft via the state, plain and simple, and it screws the taxpayers!

    Reply
  2. Carl Bujan.

    Now the democrats want to take property from people, they should sue the city.

    Reply
  3. David

    All you need to do is look at public housing in other cities (Chicago’s Cabrini Green) to see how it all works out in the end. Rents stay low but so does the quality of life and the neighborhood.

    Reply
  4. Katie

    This, my friends, is what real socialism is. Be afraid………Bernie Sanders, E. Warren, Buttigeig, Yang, are all Socialists. Don’t be fooled, these Players are real Socialist running on the guise of the Democrat ticket. And I listed their names in the order of how radical they really are. Your hard earned money in your personal savings accounts will soon be shared wealth if a Democrat Socialist gets into the White House.

    Reply
  5. Shelba

    Any state that elects democRATS as governor will get sooner or later a socialist instead of a democRAT, right now there is no difference between the two parties, the democRATS have sold their souls for power and most of all the rape of the American taxpayer, if we don’t hamstring the democRATS in November by voting against them that is exactly what America will get SOCIALISM

    Reply
  6. Robert

    Another reason to stay out of NAZIfornia.

    Reply
  7. kingsleytrust

    Born and raised San Diego, I was able to see this garbage coming as early as !998 and by 2000 the wife and I had managed successfully to exit all business dealings, commercial & residential R.E. and logistics from the abuses of CA. It’s honestly a shame what the socialist have managed to ruin in just 20 short years.

    Reply

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published.

Follow Us