Site icon The Punching Bag Post

Judge Merchan on defendant side of lawsuit

&NewLine;<p class&equals;"wp-block-paragraph">Judge Juan Merchan&comma; who presided over President Trump’s so-called hush money criminal case is now the target of a lawsuit by American First Legal &lpar;AFL&rpar; to secure the judge’s financial disclosure records&period; AFL is a public interest group that bills itself as a conservative alternative to the left-wing American Civil Liberties Union &lpar;ACLU&rpar;&period;&nbsp&semi; It was founded by former White House aide Stephen Miller&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p class&equals;"wp-block-paragraph">The issue is access to the official financial disclosure records that judges&comma; like Merchan&comma; are required to fill out and put on the public record&period;&nbsp&semi;&nbsp&semi; The issue is simple&period;&nbsp&semi; The &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;disclosure” means that judges are to reveal to the public the requested financial information to establish any conflicts of interest or improper financial dealings&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p class&equals;"wp-block-paragraph">According to AFL Vice President Dan Epstein&comma; &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;The law is clear that judicial financial disclosures must be released to the public&period; &nbsp&semi;New York’s highest court has stated that such disclosures are necessary for parties before the courts to get a fair shake&period;”<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p class&equals;"wp-block-paragraph">Epstein said the request for the financial records is to see if Merchan has any conflicts of interest or if he has failed to make the required filing at all&period;&nbsp&semi; The lawsuit notes several examples of alleged bias – including &lpar;1&rpar; Merchan not recusing himself based on political bias&comma; &lpar;2&rpar; allowing inadmissible evidence to be introduced&comma; &lpar;3&rpar; imposing an unconstitutional gag order&comma; and &lpar;4&rpar; not allowing Federal Elections Commission Chairman Bradley Smith to testify&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p class&equals;"wp-block-paragraph">The interest in Merchan’s financial records stems from two issues&period;&nbsp&semi; He has admitted to making an illegal campaign contribution&period;&nbsp&semi; Judges are prohibited from making any financial contribution to political campaigns&period;&nbsp&semi; It was not an extravagant amount&comma; but still a violation of the law&period;&nbsp&semi; It opens up the question as to whether there have been other such campaign contributions&period;&nbsp&semi; Merchan was a regular supporter of Democrat candidates prior to his serving on the bench&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p class&equals;"wp-block-paragraph">In addition to the personal campaign contribution&comma; the judge’s daughter is a major fund raiser for Democrat candidates&comma; including President Biden and Vice President Harris – who can politically benefit from legal actions taken against the former President&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p class&equals;"wp-block-paragraph">According to the law&comma; the financial disclosure documents are to be disclosed upon request&period;&nbsp&semi;&nbsp&semi; Merchan has not provided his disclosure documents to AFL and the organization has now had to file a lawsuit&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p class&equals;"wp-block-paragraph">The request for the documents is motivated by questions regarding Merchan’s actions and rulings during the Trump trial&period; Critics have accused the judge of bias against Trump&period;  Many legal scholars have contended that both the indictment and the trial were outside legal tradition and politically motivated&period;  Others argue that those concerns&comma; themselves&comma; are politically motivated&period;  That conflict is why full disclosure is important and this time – and why refusal to disclose creates suspicion&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p class&equals;"wp-block-paragraph">Whether related to the pending lawsuit or not&comma; Merchan surprised everyone by agreeing to the Trump attorney’s request to postpone the September 16 sentencing until after the election&period;&nbsp&semi; The new sentencing date is November 26&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p class&equals;"wp-block-paragraph">As expected&comma; Trump is appealing the conviction&period;&nbsp&semi; Based on issues of immunity&comma; there is a chance the entire matter will again wind up in the Supreme Court over the issue of admissible evidence&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p class&equals;"wp-block-paragraph">While those on the left are clamoring for sentencing and jail time for the former President&comma; it is unlikely that that would happen while the appeal is in process&period;&nbsp&semi; This means the case will not be resolved for a long time&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p class&equals;"wp-block-paragraph">If Trump is reelected President&comma; he could not stop the prosecution or pardon himself since this is not a federal case&period;&nbsp&semi; But the case would be put on hold for four years – and who knows after that&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p class&equals;"wp-block-paragraph">For now&comma; the AFL lawsuit is the only Trump-related legal issue that could &&num;8230&semi; just could &&num;8230&semi; reach a conclusion before the election&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p class&equals;"wp-block-paragraph">So&comma; there &OpenCurlyQuote;tis&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;

Exit mobile version