Site icon The Punching Bag Post

Is Pope Francis meddling in our election?

<p>If ever there was an evergreen issue in the 2020 election&comma; it is foreign interference&period;  It began with a politically motivated investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 election&period;  Despite the drumbeat of accusations over the past four years&comma; there are two things we know – that neither President Trump nor his campaign were involved in a criminal conspiracy with Russian operatives and the established meddling by Russian propagandists did not change the outcome of the 2016 election&period;  Democrats and the media are hoping we forget those two facts&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>More recently&comma; American intelligence agencies indicate that Russia is again meddling – this time in favor of Trump – BUT that China and Iran are also meddling against Trump&period;  That part of the intelligence report receives very little attention from the media for obvious reasons&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>While the leaders of Russia&comma; China and Iran deny such interference&comma; there is one head-of-state that is openly meddling &&num;8212&semi;  and meddling against Trump&period; He rules over a small city-state in the middle of Italy&period;  Of course&comma; I am referring to Pope Francis&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>In a recently released encyclical letter entitled <em>Fratelli Tutti<&sol;em> &lpar;no&comma; that is not the name of an Italian dessert&rpar;&comma; Francis engages in a series of political dog whistles&period;  In his letter&comma; Francis pontificated – figuratively and literally – against those who he deemed guilty of &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;myopic&comma; extremist&comma; resentful and aggressive nationalism&period;”  This is an odd criticism from a cleric who has been dubbed the Peronist Pope for his controversial and questionable association with the brutal authoritarian leadership of Juan and Evita Peron during the Pontiff’s days in Argentina&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>The Pope fails to understand the difference between bottom-up popular nationalism &lpar;patriotism&rpar; as found in a democratic republic and top-down authoritarian nationalism that is the currency of despots&period;  We limited-government conservatives abhor authoritarians of all ilk&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>The Pope called out those who he claims view immigrants as &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;less worthy&comma; less important&comma; less human&period;”  In this regard&comma; the Pope seems to bear false witness against any who disagree with his no-borders view&period;  He has previously criticized the United States’ effort to secure the national border from illegal entry&period;  Has the Pope not noticed that many violent conflicts occur where there is no respect for established and secure national borders&quest;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Francis went on to condemn the capitalistic free market by writing &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;The marketplace&comma; by itself&comma; cannot resolve every problem&comma; however much we are asked to believe this dogma of neoliberal faith&period; Whatever the challenge&comma; this impoverished and repetitive school of thought always offers the same recipes&period;”<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>The Pope refers to &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;the magic theories of &OpenCurlyQuote;spillover’ or &OpenCurlyQuote;trickle&period;’ ” — a direct reference to the FACT – not theory – that the free market economy has brought the greatest life-style benefits to the middle and lower classes than any economic system in history&period; If the Pope is a socialist who believes – sincerely&comma; perhaps – that socialism benefits the common person&comma; he is not a student of history&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Francis should know better&comma; but unfortunately&comma; he is what socialist leaders tend to be – a top-down authoritarian dictator&period;  He sees we the people as &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;lambs” that are to be ruled over because we cannot rule over ourselves&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>In stressing his theory&comma; the Pope uses an uncomfortable word&period;  He claims his philosophy is based on the &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;communitarian dimension of life&period;”  If he were forthright&comma; he would skip the variation of the word and just admit that his philosophy is &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;communism&period;”<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Francis jumped deeply into the American campaign by taking up the Democrat&&num;8217&semi;s rhetoric and issues&period;  In terms of health care&comma; the Pope pleaded to &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;… keep in mind all those elderly persons who died for lack of respirators&comma; partly as a result of the dismantling&comma; year after year&comma; of healthcare systems&period;”  That could have been lifted from a Biden speech – and knowing Biden’s proclivity for plagiarism&comma; may find it way there&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Francis’ encyclical at this time is no coincidence&period;  He is sending an anti-Trump&comma; anti-conservative – and in my judgment – anti-American message to strategically bolster the campaign of former Vice President Joe Biden and the American Democratic Party&period;  Francis is meddling in our election&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>While the Pope does not mention Trump or Republicans by name&comma; his targets could not be clearer&period;  In fact&comma; Francis’ words are being picked up by the far left as an endorsement of the Democrats&period;  I ran across most of the information in the commentary in an article by E&period; J&period; Dionne&comma; Jr&period;&comma; one of the further-left of the far-left scribes at the <em>Washington Post<&sol;em>&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>According to Dionne&comma; the Pope proved that he was no radical left-winger by linking his opposition to the death penalty to the writings of his predecessors&comma; Popes Benedict and John Paul – who Dionne described as more conservative&period;  First of all&comma; every Pope has opposed the death penalty just as they have opposed abortion&period;  To expand the linkage on one narrow issue to a more general characterization of Pope Francis is specious and anyone who thinks that the current Pope does not govern from the far left has not been following his papal messaging&period;  Francis is not John Paul&comma; who abhorred crushing oppression of communism&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Was Francis directing his words at Trump’s recent debate performance when he wrote&comma; &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;Political life no longer has to do with healthy debates about long-term plans to improve people’s lives and to advance the common good&comma; but only with slick marketing techniques primarily aimed at discrediting others&period;”<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Dionne admits the obvious – that the Pope’s intent is to influence the American election&period;  The <em>Post<&sol;em> columnist writes that &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;it was hard not to think of the President as Francis described &OpenCurlyQuote;a strategy of ridicule&comma; suspicion and relentless criticism&period;’ ”  It did make me think of President Trump&comma; but more as the victim of the strategy of ridicule&comma; suspicion and relentless criticism deployed by the left&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Do we now add Vatican City to Russia&comma; China and Iran as nations strategically meddling in the 2020 presidential election&quest;   Does Francis join the ranks of Putin&comma; Xi and Ali Khamenei as just another errant authoritarian head-of-state attempting to undermine the American election&quest;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Dionne admits that many may question the infallibility of the Pope’s words&period;  We will and we should&period;  Even if you believe in papal infallibility&comma; it only applies when a pope speaks &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;ex cathedra&period;”  As best as I can tell&comma; Francis did not invoke that power when issuing his latest open letter – and even in my long ago Roman Catholic days&comma; I never believed in the doctrine of infallibility&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>I do believe that Francis is attempting to meddle in our election&comma; but I also believe that it will be ignored by Democrats and a politically biased news media for the same reason they are not exercised over the anti-Trump meddling by China and Iran&period;  Perhaps Francis would be more religious if he were to issue an encyclical against political hypocrisy&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>So&comma; there &OpenCurlyQuote;tis&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;

Exit mobile version