Site icon The Punching Bag Post

Is it Trump vs. scientists … or scientists vs. scientists?

<p>We hear the mantra on the so-called news networks that we should listen to the scientists – you know&comma; the doctors&comma; the epidemiologists&comma; the heads of the health agencies and guys and gals like Dr&period; Anthony Fauci and Dr&period; Deborah Brix &&num;8212&semi;  and virtually any white coat that the media hires to sell the network anti-Trump narrative&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>The problem is that if you do listen to the scientists and doctors&comma; it is like getting a second opinion on a gall bladder operation – you will get quite different points-of-view&period;  Of course&comma; if you only listen to the networks pre-screened doctors&comma; you will get the same opinion offered up as fact&period;  It usually is politicized as an attack on President Trump – and by extensions&comma; an attack on Republicans and conservatives&period;  It is even an attack on the American people who do not fall in line with the left-wing political views of most of the east coast media&period;  All their commentary is put through the partisan political prism&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>The spirit of never letting a crisis go to waste – a political strategy first espoused by Democrat operative Rahm Emanuel – Democrats and their media allies have put their mendacious narrative of the Covid-19 Pandemic on 24&sol;7 spin&period;  They have weaponized the global disaster&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>If you get your news from other than the arrogant elitist New York media cabal – or if you really listen to ALL the scientists and doctors – you get a very different impression&period;  First&comma; you discover that the scientists and doctors do not agree – and even more informative is the fact that even doctors like Fauci have changed their assessments and advice over time&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>For example&comma; at the time they accused Trump of downplaying the threat of the virus&comma; Fauci&comma; himself said that it was not a big deal and would not likely significantly impact the United States&period;  While the anti-Trump media constantly replays the President’s long ago comments&comma; they bury what Fauci was saying at the same time&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>On one television program in March&comma; Fauci was asked if he would wear a mask in public&period;  He derisively responded rhetorically&comma; &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;Why would I wear a mask&period; I don’t have any symptoms&period;”  That’s right&period;  That was the prevailing wisdom of the nation’s top scientist at the time&period;  I wrote a commentary on that interview&period;  With that error in judgment&comma; Fauci could be said to be responsible for tens of thousands of needless deaths – just as they blame Trump&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>You will recall that in the past&comma; the scientists and doctors were advising the wearing of masks ONLY by those who had the disease – or at least some symptoms&period;  The medical professionals were quite uniform in their assessment that masks were NOT a good preventative measure&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>If you recall in the first few months of the White House Task Force on the Corona Virus&comma; no one was wearing a mask during the briefings – and there was no social distancing&period;  There was no call from the scientists to do so&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>In the next generation of mask policy&comma; we were advised to wear masks in in-door public venues&period;  They were not needed outside&comma; we were told – especially if you social distance&period;  Eventually that bit of advice was amended to propose mask wearing at all times when outside the home&period;  Now they are hinting that masks inside the home can stem the rise in intra-family spread&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Even today&comma; there are doctors who question the effectiveness of universal mask wearing&period;  They are&comma; of course&comma; being pilloried by the media and doctors who have ascribed the new theory of mask effectiveness&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>If you want to blame Trump for the spread of the virus&comma; okay … but equal blame goes to all those scientists and doctors who could not agree on mitigating protocols – who gave bad advice&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>And it is not just about masks&period;  Fauci once said that Hydroxychloroquine showed promise&period;  Today&comma; the media reports that it is not only ineffective but potentially dangerous&period;  They do not report that Fauci has called Hydroxychloroquine one of the safest drugs in the medical arsenal&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>They also fail to note that thousands of doctors are prescribing the drug as a prophylactic for Covid-19 every day&period;  One doctor recently reported that he prescribed it to 1700 Covid-19 infected individuals of all ages&period;  Every one of them recovered from the disease when – according to statistics – at least 50 of them should have died&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>I am not accusing them of reckless disregard&period;  As Fauci&comma; himself&comma; has stated&comma; they learned things along the way&period;  Fair enough&period;  They got it wrong&comma; but it was not malicious&period;  That standard should also apply to Trump&comma; but the media is not interested in facts or fairness&period;  They are locked in a shameful political effort to get Trump out of office even if it means spreading flawed information and advice&period;  It is the same role they have been playing for the past four years&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Yes&comma; we should listen to the scientists – and definitely not to the reporters&period;  But if you do objective inquiry and research – as I do&&num;8211&semi; you will find that the scientists and doctors disagree among themselves&period;  When the media reports that all the scientists agree on this or that&comma; they are lying&period;  They are pushing political narratives&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>I believe that all these social policies of mask wearing and social distancing are only slowing down the spread of Covid-19&period;  The virus will be with us until we have effective mitigation and vaccines&period; Yes&comma; the cases and hospitalizations are rising in the United States – although the death rate is still dropping – but there are surges in a lot of European nations that had imposed very strict shutdown measures&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Thanks to Trump’s Warp Speed program&comma; treatment protocols and medications are being produced at record speed&period;  Remember … it was the scientists and doctors who said we would not have a vaccine for two years&period;  Today&comma; we are on the cusp of approving more than one vaccine before the end of the year – possibly within weeks&period;  China and Russia have both approved vaccines already – although it is wise to be wary of their approval process&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>In addition&comma; we have medications that show promise in mitigating the disease&comma; including Regeneron&comma; which was administered to Trump&period;  As a person in the high-risk category with underlying conditions&comma; all we can say is that Trump had a remarkably swift and complete recovery&period;  We should all hope and pray that those drugs played an important role – and will be available to the public sooner than later&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Trump may have made mistakes&comma; but no one is misleading the public today more than our mainstream media&period;  It is about time that they take their own advice and listen to the scientists – all the scientists – and report fairly on the various opinions&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>If we only listened to scientific views that had political patronage and public popularity promoted by powerful institutions&comma; we would still believe that the earth is flat&comma; the sun is the center of the universe&comma; bleeding cures diseases and cocaine is a beneficial over-the-counter drug&period;  Scientists often get it wrong before they get it right&period;  That is not an anti-science view&period;  It is just that we should listen to all the evolving opinions before embracing one&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>So&comma; there &OpenCurlyQuote;tis&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;

Exit mobile version