Site icon The Punching Bag Post

How Trump Will Reshape the U.S. Judiciary System

<p class&equals;"MsoNormal" style&equals;"text-align&colon; left&semi;" align&equals;"center">It has been reported that president-elect Trump will be able to appoint over 100 vacancies in the federal and district courts&comma; meaning he will be able to reshape the court system in the Republican favor&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">In Obama&rsquo&semi;s eight years&comma; he had about half of that number with 54 openings to fill&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">&ldquo&semi;Obama White House officials blame Senate Republicans for what they characterize as an unprecedented level of obstruction in blocking the Democratic president&rsquo&semi;s court picks&comma;&rdquo&semi; writes <em style&equals;"mso-bidi-font-style&colon; normal&semi;">The Washington Post&period;<&sol;em> &ldquo&semi;The result is a multitude of openings throughout the federal circuit and district courts that will allow the new Republican president to quickly make a wide array of lifetime appointments&period;&rdquo&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">This does mean that it is likely that the new court officials will be more supportive of conservative agenda&period; Trump has said he will select individuals who share the ideals of the late Supreme Court justice Antonin Scalia&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">Conservatives are optimistic about the future of the U&period;S&period; courts&period; &nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">&ldquo&semi;I&rsquo&semi;m optimistic he&rsquo&semi;ll come at this right out of the gate&comma;&rdquo&semi; said Carrie Severino&comma; chief counsel and policy director of the Conservative group Judicial Crisis Network&period; &ldquo&semi;Every president can expect to make a huge impact&period; &lbrack;Trump&rsqb; is unique in having campaigned really hard on this issue &mdash&semi; the significance of the courts&comma; and of the Supreme Court in particular&period;&rdquo&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">25 of Obama&rsquo&semi;s court nominees were pending&comma; but now the openings will be determined by president-elect Trump&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">&ldquo&semi;The replacement of our beloved Justice Scalia will be a person of similar views&comma; principles and judicial philosophies&comma;&rdquo&semi; said Trump at the Republican National Convention&period; &ldquo&semi;Very important&period; This will be one of the most important issues decided by this election&period;&rdquo&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">However&comma; Trump will be under a tremendous amount of pressure to fil these spots quickly&period; There are several areas around the country with long lists of cases waiting to be settled due to long-vacant seats&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">&ldquo&semi;There are 38 so-called judicial emergencies&comma; according to the nonpartisan Judicial Conference&comma; including in Texas&comma; where seven seats have sat empty for more than one year&period; The Obama administration and the state&rsquo&semi;s two conservative Republican senators could not come to an agreement on nominees for the many openings&comma;&rdquo&semi; writes <em style&equals;"mso-bidi-font-style&colon; normal&semi;">The Washington Post&period;<&sol;em><&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">Democrats have been quick to blame Republicans for &ldquo&semi;obstructing&rdquo&semi; the election of qualified judges&period; &nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">&ldquo&semi;Despite the fact that there are dozens of qualified&comma; consensus nominees pending on the Senate floor right now&comma; we will finish this Congress having confirmed just 22 judicial nominees in two years&period; That is the lowest number since Harry Truman was president&comma;&rdquo&semi; said Sen&period; Patrick J&period; Leahy &lpar;Vt&period;&rpar;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">But&comma; judicial vacancy data is all relative&period;<span style&equals;"mso-spacerun&colon; yes&semi;">&nbsp&semi;<&sol;span><&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">&ldquo&semi;The White House has very little to complain about because no matter how they spin it&comma; the fact is that President Obama had more judicial nominees confirmed than President Bush&comma;&rdquo&semi; said Beth Levin&comma; spokeswoman for Senator Chuck&nbsp&semi;Grassley&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">The Senate has confirmed 329 of Obama&rsquo&semi;s nominees&comma; which is more than Bush&rsquo&semi;s 326&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">Nonetheless&comma; Trump&rsquo&semi;s presidency means change&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">&ldquo&semi;Russell Wheeler&comma; an expert on judicial nominations at the Brookings Institution&comma; said Trump has a great opportunity to change the partisan split in the federal courts&period; He predicted that by mid-2020&comma; Republican appointees would hold about half of the 673 district judgeships&comma; as opposed to the current 34 percent&period; And among the 179 circuit court judgeships&comma; Democratic appointees now hold a slim majority&comma; 51 percent&comma; but that could fall to about 43 percent&comma;&rdquo&semi; writes <em style&equals;"mso-bidi-font-style&colon; normal&semi;">The Washington Post&period; <&sol;em><&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">But&comma; Wheeler did say that the 28 Democratic senators will be giving the Trump administration some major opposition about his nominations&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;

Exit mobile version