Site icon The Punching Bag Post

HORIST: Trump gets a YUGE ‘I told you so’ from Mueller

<p>There is much detail yet to be revealed in the Mueller Report&period;  But the fact that there are no further indictments means that there was no collusion between President Trump – or members of his campaign – with Russia&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>None&period;  Hnkto&period;  No subsequent details in the Report will change that fact or its meaning&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>After approximately two years&comma; tens of thousands of man-hours of aggressive investigation and the expenditure of tens of millions of taxpayer dollars&comma; Special Counsel Robert Mueller failed to find sufficient evidence to indict ANYONE associated with Trump of collusion with the Russians&period;  Trump’s &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;no collusion” mantra has been totally vindicated&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>It is important to keep in mind that those associated with the campaign who have been indicted in conjunction with the investigation have been charged with secondary process crimes – basically lying to investigators about a crime that is now shown to not have existed according to Mueller&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Of course&comma; there are a bunch of Russian operatives who have been indicted for illegal interference with our election&period;  The lack of indictments of any campaign official&comma; Trump family member or the President himself means there was no linkage … period&period;  The Russian counterintelligence investigation is still ongoing on at the FBI&comma; but no longer tied to Trump or his associates&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>With this conclusion&comma; the entire political house-of-cards propped up by Democrats and their propaganda arm in the elitist east coast media comes crumbling down&period;  For two years&comma; they have proffered the argument that the campaign had colluded&period;  They said it outright&period;  They flat-out accused Trump of being an agent – and asset – of the Russian Federation&period;  Democrat historian-hack John Meacham even suggested that Trump was guilty of treason just hours before the release of the Mueller Report&period;  On a daily basis&comma; they convicted Trump and his campaign in the kangaroo court-of-public opinion of the most heinous crimes against America without a shred of evidence – just false narratives based on political hot air&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>That entire false narrative so often presented as fact-based has now crashed to the ground&period;  It is now clear that for the past two years&comma; the major media has been willfully and maliciously deceiving the public&period;  They have exacerbated public division discord by engaging in the most shameful partisan propaganda paraded as news&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>For months&comma; Democrats have been split over whether to go forward with impeachment regardless of any compelling evidence – mostly just out of sheer hatred for Trump –  or to wait on the conclusions of the Mueller investigations&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Weeeeell&comma; now that they have the major conclusion – no indictments for collusion&comma; ergo no collusion &&num;8211&semi;most of the basis&comma; the reasons&comma; the rationale for all those Democrat-run congressional investigations evaporates&period;  But they are determined to persist&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>As could be expected&comma; the anti-Trump media is filled with talking heads creating amended false narratives&period;  They say it is still possible that Trump was guilty of both collusion and obstruction of justice but avoided the indictment only because – according to Justice Department regulations – a sitting President cannot be indicted&period;  Even in the wake of the Mueller Report&comma; MSNBC’s Nicole Wallace still claims that Trump is guilty of collusion and obstruction of justice – and she is not alone in the rejection of innocent until proven guilty&period;  They believe – nay&comma; hope – that other investigations will uncover the collusion and obstruction of justice that were not produced through the enormous efforts of Mueller and his team&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>They also argue – without any foundation in fact – that it is only because a sitting President cannot be indicted that Trump was not &period;  It is pure nonsense to suggest that Trump would be indicted for having colluded with Russians as part of his campaign without anyone else being indicted&period;  The Democrats’ desperate argument may have had some credibility if those around Trump had been indicted&period;  But nooooo&period;  If Donald Trump&comma; Jr&period; Ivanka Trump&comma; Jared Kushner&comma; Roger Stone&comma; Paul Manafort&comma; Rick Gates&comma; Michael Flynn&comma; Michael Cohen&comma; George Papadopoulos&comma; Jerome Corsi&comma; Alex Van De Zwaan and many others did not receive indictments for colluding with Russia – and they did not &&num;8212&semi; it does not take a legal scholar to figure out that the crime of collusion did not exist&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>If the Mueller Report has not made liars out of a LOT of Democrats and media analysts&comma; it sure destroyed their credibility – including the smarmy Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff&comma; who claimed to have seen evidence proving collusion and obstruction&period;  In desperation to salvage some of the political ground they lost in the past 24 hours&comma; they are demanding to see the details in the Mueller Report&period;  They are speculating that there could still be impeachable offenses hidden in the details&period;  Highly unlikely&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Their request for all the paperwork of the Mueller team is nothing more than seeking figurative stacks of hay in the hope of finding a needle&period;  It is an abuse of congressional power&comma; according to liberal Democrat super-lawyer Alan Dershowitz&period;  He has even proposed filing a suit against Congress for exceeding its oversight authority&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>The Mueller investigation was to answer one primary question&period;  Did Russia interfere with our election in 2016&quest;  And yes&comma; they did&period;  That is evident in the fact that a majority of Mueller’s indictments were leveled against Russian operatives&period;  But not with Trump’s help&period;  The secondary investigation &&num;8212&semi; into collusion by the Trump campaign &&num;8212&semi; has proven to be a &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;dry hole&period;”<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Even worse for Democrats&comma; the backlash is coming&period;  With the vindication of Trump on collusion and obstruction of justice&comma; the political and media spotlight turns to the &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;why” and &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;how” this fruitless and bogus investigative sideshow got started in the first place&period;  The accusation that it was NOT launched as a legitimate intelligence investigation but rather a political investigation to remove a duly elected President gains a lot of credibility – and is worthy of serious investigation&period;  It is&comma; in fact&comma; an investigation that is currently being conducted within the Justice Department and the FBI by the Inspector General&period;  With the collusion issue out of the way&comma; it may now get the attention it deserves&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>It appears that for months&comma; a Democrats and the propaganda press believed that Mueller was going to indict someone for collusion or obstruction of justice – most predominantly the President&period;  So did a lot of Republicans&period;  Their claim of waiting for the Mueller Report before proceeding with impeachment was founded on that erroneous belief – that hope&period;  Now they are facing the worst shock to their political mindset since Trump’s election&comma; itself&period;  It is amazing to watch them desperately spinning on television like Whirling Dervishes as the main pillar of their post-election Resistance Movement strategy crumbles&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>And yes&comma; there are still those investigations going on in the Southern District of New York&period;  They involve the personal business practices of the Trump organization&period;  We really do not know where all that will lead&period;  But they are beginning to look like prosecutorial excesses – maybe even abuse&period;  More like politically piling on than the pursuit of justice&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Yes&comma; there may be criticism of Trump in the report&period;  And yes&comma; Democrats and the &num;NeverTrump media will spin whatever they can to try to justify their shameless mendacious reporting that has resulted in relentless propaganda and real damage to the republic&period;  That is why as bad as Trump can be at times&comma; he is still generally a better option for many Americans than the low character&comma; the radical policies and the gross dishonesty of his hateful enemies&period;  If the FBI and the major news services have suffered a blow to their reputations – and they have – they should look to those within their professions who caused the damage&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>So&comma; there &OpenCurlyQuote;tis&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;

Exit mobile version