<p class="MsoNormal"> ;We are now approximately one month away from the midterm election.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> ; </span>I liken this period in our election cycle to the Peanuts comic strip where Lucy always pulls the teed-up ball away and has Charlie Brown landing on his butt.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> ; </span>In my analogy, the Republicans are Lucy, <span style="mso-no-proof: yes;">and</span> the Democrats are Charlie Brown.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-no-proof: yes;">If you</span> have followed my writing over the years &ndash; something even my family does not do &ndash; you would have seen many references to the traditional GOP surge in the last days of an election.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> ; </span>Just a year ago, I did a commentary suggesting that Democrats not get too giddy about their prospects in 2018 despite the tradition that the party in the White House always loses seats in midterm elections.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> ; </span>It is usually the case, but not always.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The Republican surge usually begins within the last 30 days of an election.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> ; </span>In just the past few days, we are seeing the leading edge of a possible Republican win in November.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> ; </span>The so-called generic ballot &ndash; which measures the general Republican/Democrat preference in Congress &ndash; had the Democrats up by double digits for months.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> ; </span>Ergo, all that talk about a blue tide &ndash; even a political tsunami.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Suddenly &ndash; at least in the minds of all those Democrats and their captive pundits in the press &ndash; the numbers are merging.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> ; </span>What was once as much as a 17-point lead for Democrats has shrunk to a <span style="mso-no-proof: yes;">five point</span> lead or less.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">In terms of real races, the Democrats recent hope &ndash; and even optimism &ndash; of taking control of both the House and the Senate is fading as Republican candidates are taking leads in those toss-up <span style="mso-no-proof: yes;">battleground</span> states.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> ; </span>In North Dakota, Republican Congressman Kevin Cramer has forged ahead to a 53/41 lead over incumbent Democrat Heidi Heitkamp. In Tennessee, Republican Marsha Blackburn is now up over Phil Bredesen 49 to 43. Incumbent Democrat Claire Mccaskill&rsquo;s, encouraging lead has dropped to a statistical tie in Missouri.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> ; </span>A temporary lead by Democrat Beto O&rsquo;Rouke over incumbent Republican Ted Cruz has vanished, <span style="mso-no-proof: yes;">and</span> Cruz has cruised to a small lead.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> ; </span>In Arizona, Florida <span style="mso-no-proof: yes;">and</span> Indiana, Democrats maintain a lead &ndash; but a lead that has been declining or fluctuating within the margin of error.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> ; </span>Too close to call.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Both the numbers and the trend lines are favorable for the GOP.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> ; </span>But why?<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> ; </span>If you listen to the smarty pants on television, it is because of the Brett Kavanaugh hearings &ndash; a backlash against Democrat excesses.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> ; </span>This sentiment was expressed by the co-hosts of MSNBC&rsquo;s Morning Joe &ndash; Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> ; </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">In an unusual departure from the prosecution of President Trump and the GOP, the Romeo and Juliet of talk television blamed the GOP<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> ; </span><span style="mso-no-proof: yes;">surge on</span> &hellip; get ready for this one <span style="mso-no-proof: yes;">&hellip;</span> on the Media and its knee-jerk habit of reporting from Democrat scripts &ndash; more commonly known as talking points. They specifically criticized excessive coverage of teenage drinking and a rash of unsubstantiated petty stories.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">To some extent, Mika and Joe are correct.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> ; </span>The bias of the media is a constant irritation and motivation for those on the right side of the political spectrum.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> ; </span>Ironically, Morning Joe is one of the programs that enrages the right as much as any.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> ; </span>They are what they now criticize.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Make no mistake, Mika&rsquo;s and Joe&rsquo;s admonitions were not fairness for fairness sake.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> ; </span>It was because they have come to realize that all that biased reporting, and all those sycophantic bobble-headed panelists&rsquo; predictions, are now hurting the Democrats and their left-wing constituency.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The movement toward Republican candidates has to be viewed in two ways.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> ; </span>Yes, the Kavanaugh hearing may have triggered the phenomenon, but it is not the root cause.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> ; </span>You have to look at many election cycles to see that it is a pattern, a tradition.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> ; </span>There you will see that in general, Republican numbers improve as the elections draw near &ndash; usually breaking into a sprint in the last 30 days.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-no-proof: yes;">As I have long advised, o</span>ne should ignore all those early polls and the armchair analyses that accompany them.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> ; </span>They have no <span style="mso-no-proof: yes;">relevance</span> to an election day outcome &ndash; none.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> ; </span>It does nothing more than to fill the media pages and time slots.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> ; </span>Even polls taken within days of an election have to be viewed with some skepticism.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The Republican takeover of the House in 2010 came as a shocker only because the press, pollsters and pundits were mistaken. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> ;</span>Same was true in <span style="mso-no-proof: yes;">2014</span> when the GOP took control of the Senate.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> ; </span>Those in the media who are supposed to be following political events and trends closely seemed unaware that Republicans had taken over two-thirds of the governorships and state legislatures during the Obama years.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> ; </span>Their admiring focus on Obama reminded me of that line from a song, &ldquo;can&rsquo;t take my eyes off of you.&rdquo;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Then there was 2016.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> ; </span>The desire not to have Donald Trump become President of the United States trumped all objectivity.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> ; </span>The media mantra was that Trump had &ldquo;no path to the presidency.&rdquo;<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> ; </span>The more the left and the media wanted the Democrats to win, the more the skewed the reporting and the polls.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> ; </span>The result was a national embarrassment for the partisan pundit community.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> ; </span>I never predicted the 2016 outcome, but I did argue that Trump did, indeed, have a path to the presidency.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I have repeatedly written that Democrats tend to win elections every day except Election Day.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> ; </span>This year, it may be the Kavanaugh hearings that trigger the surge, but it has been and will always be something &ndash; some event, some statement &ndash; that will bring a majority of voters home to their right-of-center values.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> ; </span>In some ways, it is just the immediacy of the election.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The best way to prognosticate elections is <span style="mso-no-proof: yes;">to not make predictions</span> too early, and within the 30-day lead-up shift three or four percentage points from the Democrats to the Republicans and you will generally get closer to the final results.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> ; </span>That is not to suggest that the Republicans will always win, but that they will almost always do better than the pre-election media and pollsters reports.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">This year is unusual in one aspect.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> ; </span>It is very rare to have one party gain in one chamber and the opposition party gain in the other.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> ; </span>But that could be the case this year.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> ; </span>It would not surprise me to see the Republicans gain a few seats in the Senate and hang on to the House majority by a smaller margin.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> ; ; </span>However, in handicapping political races and horse races, there are no certainties &ndash; only odds.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> ; ;</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><em><span style="font-size: 9.5pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: TimesNewRomanPS-ItalicMT; mso-bidi-font-family: TimesNewRomanPS-ItalicMT;">Larry Horist is a conservative activist with an extensive background in economics, public policy <span style="mso-no-proof: yes;">and</span> political issues. Clients of his consulting firm have included such conservative icons as Steve Forbes and Milton Friedman, and he has served as a consultant to the White House under Presidents Nixon and Reagan. He has testified as an expert witness before numerous legislative bodies, including the U. S. Congress and lectured at Harvard University, Northwestern University, Florida Atlantic University, Knox College and Hope College. An award-winning debater, his insightful and sometimes controversial commentaries <span style="mso-no-proof: yes;">appear frequently</span> on the editorial pages of newspapers across the nation. He can be reached at </span></em><a href="mailto:lph@thomasandjoyce.com"><span style="mso-bookmark: _Hlk522535130;"><em><span style="font-size: 9.5pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: TimesNewRomanPS-ItalicMT; mso-bidi-font-family: TimesNewRomanPS-ItalicMT;">lph@thomasandjoyce.com</span></em></span></a><span style="mso-bookmark: _Hlk522535130;"><em><span style="font-size: 9.5pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: TimesNewRomanPS-ItalicMT; mso-bidi-font-family: TimesNewRomanPS-ItalicMT;">.</span></em></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> ;</p>