Site icon The Punching Bag Post

HORIST: Mueller failed to do his job

<p>Robert Mueller just put the nation through a Kabuki Theater drama for almost two years&period;  He was more than willing to indict a bunch of Russians and Russian entities for meddling in our elections&period;  He was a strict prosecutor in charging a number of individuals with lying to investigators about their meetings with Russians – meetings that Mueller determined had NO relationship with aiding and abetting Russia in its efforts to interfere with the election&period;  The Mueller Report&comma; itself&comma; declared that there was NO evidence of cooperation between Trump&comma; his campaign&comma; and Russians&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Mueller moved aggressively to ensure that a range of unrelated crimes discovered in the course of his investigation was pursued by other investigators&period;  These include the personal crimes of greed against Paul Manafort and Michael Cohen&period;  And he is leaving it up to the Southern District of New York to investigate the alleged campaign finance violations&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Mueller made it very clear in his Report – as reflected in the letter from Attorney General Robert Barr &&num;8212&semi; that there was no indictment for criminal collusion because there was no evidence of criminal collusion by Trump&comma; by any of those even indicted and convicted for the process crime lying to investigators and by any other American citizen&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>On the question of obstruction of justice&comma; Mueller sleazed out&period;  According to the Barr letter&comma; Mueller could not make a determination on the obstruction accusation&period;  In that case&comma; he chose to lay out the arguments for indictment and the arguments against – and left it up to the Attorney General to decide&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>One can safely assume that the lack of an obstruction of justice claim – even in the face of the inability to indict a sitting President – is exoneration&period;  In this instance&comma; Mueller comes close to violating Department of Justice rules against slandering someone who is not indicted&period;  Mueller disgracefully hinted that there was damning information but no reason to indict – making the information ineligible for public disclosure&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Mueller says he could not determine whether a crime had been committed or not&period;  He said the evidence was not sufficiently compelling to indict – even by a sealed indictment to take effect after Trump leaves office&period;  Conversely&comma; Mueller claims that he could not exonerate Trump from the obstruction charge&period;  But he actually did by not even making a case for indictment – even if Trump could not be immediately indicted&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Mueller sleazed out&period;  He did not do his job&period;  In a very real sense&comma; Mueller is doing exactly what former FBI Director James Comey did – suggested a person did a lot of improper things without bringing an indictment&period;  Comey got a rebuke from the FBI Inspector General for that breach of protocol&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Making a determination about criminal collusion and obstruction of justice is what Mueller was commissioned to do&period;  A special counsel was appointed to take the matter out of the hands of the Attorney General in order to remove even the appearance of bias&period;  Mueller had no problem indicting people on process crimes – basically lying to investigators about a crime that was never committed&period;  That level of prosecution does not rest well with most Americans&period;  Charging someone with obstructing justice when there is no crime involved seems … well … just wrong&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>In fact&comma; it is the general practice to not indict someone for obstruction of justice when there is no underlying crime – so why prosecute lies&comma; which could be seen as a form of obstruction&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>It seems that Mueller did not wish to exonerate Trump on the obstruction charge and rather than make a decision&comma; he punted&period;  Mueller also had to know that by not directly exonerating Trump he would trigger an ugly partisan feud that would be launched by the &num;NeverTrump Democrats&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Mueller put the Attorney General in the position to be politically demonized by the anti-Trump Resistance Movement and the blood-thirsty Democrats in Congress – and will add fuel to the partisan feud that is undermining American political civility&period;  Thanks a lot&comma; Robert&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>It is now time for all Americans to re-focus on one of the fundamentals of our judicial system – innocent until PROVEN guilty&period;  Even an indictment is not a confirmation of guilty&period;  That is the purview of judges and juries&period;  At this moment&comma; President Trump is innocent of any criminal activity … period&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>While there are other cases out there being ginned up by partisan prosecutors&comma; based on all the reporting and accusations – you know&comma; all those Democrats&comma; reporters and pundits who declared Trump guilty of collusion&comma; obstruction and even treason – the Mueller probe was the major play because the folks on the left were sure that Mueller would bring forth indictments of Trump family members&comma; charges of obstruction and collusion and the basis for Trump’s impeachment&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Apart from going after the Russians&comma; who were the actual criminals&comma; the Mueller investigation into Trump was a shame and a waste of time and money&period;  It was launched as a political effort to oust the duly elected President by a number of bad actors in our law enforcement and intelligence communities&period; They have proven to be more dangerous to the republic than Trump could ever be&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>So&comma; there &OpenCurlyQuote;tis&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;

Exit mobile version