Site icon The Punching Bag Post

HORIST: Is Xi JinPing China’s Vladimir Putin?

<p>When we look at the adversarial relationship between Russia and the United States today&comma; we are reminded of the days of the Cold War when the two nations were involved in pervasive confrontation short of direct warfare&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>We often forget that following the collapse of the Soviet Union&comma; Russia was transformed into a more democratic nation with a friendly relationship with America&period;  During the all-but-forgotten presidency of Boris Yeltsin&comma; American and other western nation businesses flooded the old czarist empire&period;  The two nations engaged in a range of cooperative activities&comma; including Russo-American space exploration – which continues to this day&period;  It was said that Russia – and communism – had been conquered by McDonalds&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Just as the moderate communist Mensheviks lost control of Russia to the hardline Bolsheviks after the Russian Revolution&comma; the democratic forces of Yeltsin lost out to the hardline leadership of the former KGB operative&comma; Vladimir Putin&period;  With Putin’s ambition to reclaim major portions of Russia’s former evil empire and reassert Russian influence throughout the world&comma; the relationship between Russia and America commenced a downward slide&period;  If not a total Cold War&comma; we have certainly entered a very chilly battle&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Following President Nixon’s successful overture to Chinese Chairman Mao ZeDong&comma; China began a slow evolution to a more open and engaged society&period;   Over time&comma; the Middle Kingdom shed many of its doctrinaire communist policies&period;  China developed a class of capitalistic businesses and gradually made investment and ownership easier for both citizens and foreign investors&period;  Beijing eased the Maoist &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;Little Red Book” oppression of the masses and surrendered more decision-making powers to provincial and municipal governments&period;  Except for the political-based Felon Gong&comma; there was a measurable increase in religious freedom&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Consistent with the patient character of the Chinese culture&comma; the changes in China were the result of evolution rather than revolution&period;  As in the case of Russia&comma; America and China developed – if not an allied relationship – a very friendly one&period;  Again&comma; American and western business flooded the country – buying&comma; selling and investing&period;  China and America even engaged in nominal joint military operations&period;  They were less strategic than symbolic&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Then along came Xi&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Unlike the thuggish Putin personality&comma; Xi is a charmer – affable&period;  He is probably a lot smarter than Putin&period;  But during his presidency&comma; some of the gains of the past have started to ebb&period;  While democracy – even in a limited form – was never part of China’s new economic and cultural policies&comma; any modest gains in citizen influence eroded under Xi&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Perhaps the most visible evidence of the restoration of top-down authoritarianism was Xi &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;thoughts” being incorporated into the Chinese Constitution&period;  While this concept is not well understood in the west&comma; it has great meaning in China&period;  It means that Xi is now the sole head of the government with virtually absolute authority for as long as he decides to exercise it&period;  Though not as brutal and depraved as Stalin and Mao&comma; Putin and Xi are as powerful as their predecessors ever were &&num;8212&semi; and arguably even more powerful because their nations are no longer isolated&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Though that Little Red Book is a rare read anymore&comma; Xi has moved to constrict personal freedom and counterpoint thinking&period;  Alarmingly similar to our own enforced political correctness policies and restrictions on free speech&comma; Xi has implemented a series of policies that set the parameters of legitimate thinking and action&period;  He defines what &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;good Chinese” people must think – at least for public consumption&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Criticism of the Chinese leadership is again being criminalized to an extent not seen since Mao&period;  There has been a crackdown on those who speak for greater democratic reforms&period;  Those who do not embrace the statements and the policies of the &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;wise leaders” are increasingly subject to arrest and incarceration&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>The crackdowns are most evident in those regions of China with the greatest forces of democratization exist – such as in the southwestern provinces as well as in Hong Kong&comma; where Xi changed the rules to give Beijing more authority&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Even as the relationship with China improved&comma; Xi has been reluctant – downright recalcitrant – in addressing Americas very real concerns over pirating intellectual property and the gross unfair trade agreements&period;  Xi’s reluctance to respond is largely due to the fact that so many American administrations simply offered up lip-service complaints and they looked the other way&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>There is both good news and bad news in the current situation&period;  First&comma; the good news&period;  The possibility of a direct military confrontation with either Russia or China is virtually zero – although there always remains the continuation of proxy shooting wars with Russia&comma; especially in the Middle East&period;  This is not likely to happen with China&period;  Outside of marginal sovereignty issues with Taiwan and a portion of the South China Sea&comma; China does not engage in military expansionism like Putin’s Russia&period;  They do not send soldiers all over the world&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>For China&comma; it is all about economic warfare and diplomatic influence&period;  Unfortunately for the U&period;S&period;&comma; the Chinese approach stands a better chance of threatening American leadership than does the Russian military muscle&period; And that is the bad news&period; By our own policies and politics&comma; we are losing world leadership to China&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>One of the amazing things I frequently point out is that despite all of China’s oppression of its people&comma; they love their country&period;  They are among the most patriotic people in the world&period;  They are proud of their culture and believe in Xi’s vision of China as the dominant nation in the world – toppling the United States&period;  It is not that the people of China hate the United States&period;  Quite the contrary&period;  But&comma; in terms of the competition for world leadership&comma; they want their country to win&period;  AND … they are aided and abetted by the rise of political left-wing liberalism in America that disrespects our leadership&comma; abhors the free-market capitalism that made America the envy of the world and dredging up of our culture to slander the American Dream&period;  And you wonder why the Chinese are winning&quest;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>So&comma; there &OpenCurlyQuote;tis&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;

Exit mobile version