Site icon The Punching Bag Post

HORIST: Independence Day: Speaking up for freedom

<p>If we were to prioritize the Freedoms articulated in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights&comma; I would select &OpenCurlyQuote;free speech” as the most important&period;  Without the ability of an individual to speak freely – and even offensively – freedom of religion would have no meaning&period;  Freedom of the press would be a myth&period;  Our right to assemble and especially to protest would be encumbered&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Free speech is fundamental to personal freedoms across the board&period; That is why among the first acts of authoritarian despots and dictators is to &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;control” speech through censorship – and to limit the scope of communication and public discourse to government sanctioned propaganda&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>I am a First Amendment extremist&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>To me&comma; free speech means just that – to express one’s opinion regardless of how that opinion may be viewed by listeners&period;  I subscribe to the statement that &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;I may not agree with what you say but will defend to the death your right to say it&period;”  Well&comma; maybe not to the death&comma; but you get the point&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>And yes&comma; that means even speech that is utterly offensive and pejorative&period;  I do not agree with this new generation of political &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;snowflakes” that see it as the responsibility of government to protect their fragile egos from harsh and insulting words  &&num;8212&semi; even of the most offensive kind&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>I do agree that freedom of speech does not extend to inciting riots or as Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes famously said&comma; to &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;yelling fire in a crowded theater&period;”  That is a misuse of speech for criminal physically dangerous purposes&period;  It is&comma; in fact&comma; using speech to deny constitutional rights to others&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>The Berkley Free Speech Movement of the 1960s tested the right of free speech as it applied to vulgar language&comma; and the courts decided that crudity and insults are protected in the public commons – and that even means what we call hate speech&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>In this era of hypersensitivity&comma; we are perilously close to censoring what has been long regarded legal and culturally accepted speech&period;  As we slide down that slippery slope of political correctness&comma; matters of political or religious differences are being seen as hate speech&period;  There are those who would criminalize not believing in the government version of climate change&comma; expressing concern about illegal border crossers or arguing against abortion as a woman’s right&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>The right of free speech does not require that we be liked&comma; popular or even correct&period;  At its foundation&comma; it means we have a right … a right … to speak as we wish in public or the privacy of our own homes&period;  I say our &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;own homes” because the right of free speech does not carry outside the commons of our proprietary private places&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>That is why businesses have a right to restrict speech on company premises&period;  You can get fired for standing on your desk at work and giving a political speech no matter how eloquent you may be – or justified you may feel&period;  When athletes or actors symbolically claim free speech by disrespecting the National Anthem while &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;at work&comma;” it is only allowable with the permission of the company bosses&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>As a trend&comma; more and more Americans are living in high rises and gated communities&period;  This makes it difficult – and in some cases impossible – for politicians and public policy advocates to hand out literature or secure signatures for candidacy petitions&period;  This tends to immobilize candidates and activists from engaging in free speech – and denies the public critical information in exercising its other constitutional rights&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>The danger of limiting and not respecting free speech is that it is arbitrary&period;  In today’s climate&comma; make a pejorative comment about a racial minority&comma; and there are severe consequences&comma; including the punitive aspects of hate speech&period;  On the other hand&comma; make a claim that men have &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;toxic genes&comma;” and you get invited to appear on talk shows&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Once we arrive at the place where free speech is so severely limited&comma; and government is allowed to be the arbiter of opinion&comma; we have not just lost the right of free speech&comma; but have nullified the entire First Amendment&comma; the Bill of Rights and much of the Constitution&comma; itself&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>So&comma; as we celebrate our nation’s birth of freedom and independence&comma; let us speak out strongly for the right to speak out strongly&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>So&comma; there &OpenCurlyQuote;tis&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;

Exit mobile version