Site icon The Punching Bag Post

HORIST: Independence Day: It is all about e pluribus unum

<p>There are two types of nations&period;  In one case&comma; it is an assemblage of people who cling to separate cultural backgrounds – customs&comma; religion&comma; food&comma; music and even language&period;  Such nations are held together by political authority from the top&period;  They tend to be countries that we describe as unstable&period; We see those kinds of nations in many Middle East Nations&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Then there are nations with a broadly accepted common culture – set of established beliefs and core principles&period;  In some cases&comma; a national culture may go back centuries with very little minority interests&period;  Many nations in Europe have evolved with that model&period;  That long history is being tested in Europe with the new influx of immigrants with a different culture and value system&period;  These nations do not assimilate well&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Of course&comma; every nation may be composed of folks from widely different backgrounds&comma; but there can still be an overarching common culture&period;  America is – or at least was – the world’s best example of the latter&period;  In contrast to the long-standing indigenous nations of Europe&comma; Africa and Asia&comma; the United States was formed as and remains an immigration nation&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>The question before our Founders was whether a nation that governed bottom up – not top down – could successfully function with the influx of individuals from widely different cultures&period;  Could new arrivals to America respect their heritage and yet accept the principles of the new culture&quest;  It was a matter of assimilation – to pledge one’s allegiance to the basic laws and beliefs of their new homeland&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>The Founders understood this challenge&period;  It is the reason that they carefully and deliberately chose the motto&comma; e pluribus unum – out of many&comma; one&period;  If America was to be successful&comma; it was important … no&comma; essential … that there be a common belief in such basics as maximum personal freedom and limited government&period;  That is the very essence of a belief in the peoples &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;inalienable” right to govern from the grassroots&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>That is why the flag and the National Anthem are such important symbols&period;  Because they mean that all of us who call ourselves Americans have a common belief in a set of principles – principles broadly outlined in our Constitution and underscored in the Bill of Rights&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Within the historic American cultures&comma; people can have and express different beliefs&period;  We can disagree on policy&period;  We can argue – even heatedly – over issues&comma; but we still accept the principles of the unique American culture&period;  We fall back on the right to speak freely – even controversially or offensively&period;  We can assemble and demonstrate our grievances against our own government&period; We can select our leaders without fear of government oppression&period;  We enact our own laws based on the basic cultural principles&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>For most of American history&comma; the people have been proud to be called &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;rough individualists” and have rejected excess government involvement in our lives with cliché expressions such as &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;don’t make a federal case of it&period;”<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>And for generations&comma; people from all over the world migrated to America for freedom – with economic improvement being only one consideration&comma; almost an afterthought&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>In the mid 1900s&comma; that began to change&period;  Most obvious in the 1930s – and then again in the 1960s – there arose movements that challenged the American culture of personal freedom&comma; limited government and free enterprise&period;  It could be described as an internal anti-American movement&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>This movement naturally arose from the progressive left&period;  Whereas the progressivism of the early 1900s was based on economics&comma; the modern progressive movement is based on political power – with economics as a subtext&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>As more and more power has evolved to the federal government in Washington&comma; D&period;C&period;&comma; we&comma; the people lost much of our ability to influence government policy&period;  More and more&comma; we have become governed over rather than governed by&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>It was noted above that nations without a common culture – a commonly accepted set of principles – are ruled over by authoritarian governments&period;  It is only natural that the growth of a more distant authoritarian government would emphasize parochial interests&period;  This balkanization of America has become so evident that we have given it a name – identity politics&period;  And we implement it with something called &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;political correctness&period;”<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>The breakdown in our common culture is seen in the increasingly institutionalized disrespect for the symbols of unity – the flag and the National Anthem&period;  Tribalization is breaking down the bond of unity – and rather than assimilating&comma; we are creating a hodgepodge of cultural islands and interests&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Where we once described America as a melting pot – the metaphor of assimilation – we have become more of a bucket of rocks – a white rock&comma; black rock&comma; brown rock&comma; red rock and yellow rock – never to blend into a common culture&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>This balkanization or tribalization of America is not based only one skin color&comma; but on the introduction of demands inconsistent with core values expressed in the Constitution&period;  The Tenth Amendment that limits the scope and power of our federal government is essentially null and void&period;  We are seeing assaults on religious expression&period;  The concept of free speech is being narrowed by government-imposed ideology&period;  Free enterprise is being undermined by the encroachment of regulatory socialism&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>It is irrefutable that we are less free today than we were in my youth&period;  That is because we a losing the struggle between governing ground up to a top down system – and in so doing&comma; we are losing the connective tissue of the common cultures&period;  We are losing our motto&period;  That is something to think about this Independence Day – and to carry forward in the future&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>We celebrate Independence Day as a celebration of our independence from the oppressive English monarchy&period;  Let us hope and pray that we have not traded that for an oppressive government in Washington&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>So&comma; there &OpenCurlyQuote;tis&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;

Exit mobile version