Site icon The Punching Bag Post

Head of EPA Pruitt: We Need to Exit the Paris Climate Agreement

<p class&equals;"MsoNormal" style&equals;"text-align&colon; left&semi;" align&equals;"center">While in an interview with <em style&equals;"mso-bidi-font-style&colon; normal&semi;">Fox and Friends<&sol;em>&comma; the new head of the Environmental Protection Agency &lpar;EPA&comma;&rpar; Scott Pruitt said he thinks that the U&period;S&period; should exit the Paris Climate Agreement&period; &nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">He called the agreement&comma; which was signed by the former President Barack Obama last November&comma; a &ldquo&semi;bad deal&rdquo&semi; for America&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">&ldquo&semi;Paris &lbrack;agreement&rsqb; is something that we need to really look at closely&period; It&rsquo&semi;s something we need to exit in my opinion&comma;&rdquo&semi; said Pruitt on the <em style&equals;"mso-bidi-font-style&colon; normal&semi;">Fox News<&sol;em>&rsquo&semi; network show&period; &ldquo&semi;It&rsquo&semi;s a bad deal for America&comma;&rdquo&semi; he continued&period; &ldquo&semi;It was an America second&comma; third&comma; or fourth kind of approach&period; China and India had no obligations under the agreement until 2030&period; We front-loaded all of our costs&period;&rdquo&semi;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">This isn&rsquo&semi;t the first time that Pruitt has referred to the agreement as a &ldquo&semi;bad deal&comma;&rdquo&semi; but it is the first time he has expressed that he feels the U&period;S&period; should cancel it&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">President Donald Trump criticized the deal while on his campaign trail and even promised to cancel it&period; Last week&comma; he refused to endorse the agreement and has proven time and time again that he plans to keep his promises&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">Trump has already removed environmental legislation&comma; including Obama&rsquo&semi;s climate orders and has cut the EPA&rsquo&semi;s budget by 31&percnt;&period; His focus instead has been on reviving the coal industry and making the U&period;S&period; less dependent on energy from overseas&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">&ldquo&semi;The Trump administration has previously said it is currently reviewing its position on climate change and energy policy and remains noncommittal&comma; for now&comma; on whether it will follow through on the president&rsquo&semi;s campaign pledge to &ldquo&semi;cancel&rdquo&semi; the 2015 Paris Climate Agreement&period; Trump&rsquo&semi;s recent executive order on energy policy&comma; which set in motion the rollback of Obama&rsquo&semi;s domestic Clean Power Plan&comma; was silent on the matter of Paris&comma;&rdquo&semi; writes <em style&equals;"mso-bidi-font-style&colon; normal&semi;">The Washington Post&period;<&sol;em> &nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">However&comma; there have been reports that some member of his advisory team have recommended to keep the deal in place&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">&ldquo&semi;However&comma; reports in March suggested that members of Trump&rsquo&semi;s senior team were&nbsp&semi;divided over pulling out of the deal&comma; with Secretary of State Rex Tillerson and his own daughter Ivanka advising him not to pull the plug over concerns it would upset major allies&comma;&rdquo&semi; writes <em style&equals;"mso-bidi-font-style&colon; normal&semi;">Breitbart<&sol;em>&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">Tillerson&rsquo&semi;s former company&comma; ExxonMobil&comma; supported the Paris Climate Agreement and wrote &ldquo&semi;the United States is well positioned to compete within the framework of the Paris agreement&comma; with abundant low-carbon resources such as natural gas&comma; and innovative private industries&comma; including the oil&comma; gas&comma; and petrochemical sectors&rdquo&semi; in a late March letter to the White House&period; &nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">&ldquo&semi;You might&rsquo&semi;ve read in the media that there was much discussion about U&period;S&period; energy policy and the fact that we&rsquo&semi;re undergoing a review of many of those policies&comma;&rdquo&semi; said Rick Perry&comma; Energy Secretary on Thursday&period; &ldquo&semi;It&rsquo&semi;s true&comma; we are and it&rsquo&semi;s the right thing to do&period;&rdquo&semi;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">Sean Spicer&comma; White House Secretary&comma; said the administration will make a decision in regards to the Paris agreement &ldquo&semi;by the time of the G7 Summit&comma; late May-ish&comma; if not sooner&period;&rdquo&semi;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">There has been some speculation that the U&period;S&period; will stay in the agreement but revise the U&period;S&period; carbon dioxide emissions target to something much more attainable&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">&ldquo&semi;It is looking like we may see them announce that they&rsquo&semi;re going to stay in Paris and also announce simultaneously that they&rsquo&semi;re going to revise the U&period;S&period; target under Paris to 2025&comma;&rdquo&semi; said Andrew Light&comma; a senior fellow in the global climate program at the World Resources Institute&period; &nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">However&comma; influential groups are in support of Pruitt&rsquo&semi;s call to cancel the Paris accord&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">&ldquo&semi;America&rsquo&semi;s participation in international climate change programs has wasted taxpayer money and led to questionable and harmful interventions in energy markets through government-backed financial programs&comma; mandates&comma; and heavy-handed regulation&comma;&rdquo&semi; said the Heritage Foundation&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">Two Heritage employees&comma; Stephen Moore and Timothy Doescher recently pointed out the impact these policies have on our coal industry&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">They wrote that the climate change promised made by the Obama administration &ldquo&semi;would effectively&nbsp&semi;decapitate our coal industry&comma; which now supplies about one-third of our electric power&period; If Trump allows this deal to go forward&comma; he will unwittingly fulfill Hillary Clinton&rsquo&semi;s arrogant and dastardly promise to put every coal miner in America out of a job&comma;&rdquo&semi; in a recent opinion piece for Investor&rsquo&semi;s Business Daily&period; &ldquo&semi;We can&rsquo&semi;t help wondering if the thousands of university professors&comma; environmental activists&comma; climatologists and government bureaucrats would be so enthusiastic if it were&nbsp&semi;their&nbsp&semi;jobs that were going to be&nbsp&semi;eliminated&period;&rdquo&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal"><strong>Author&rsquo&semi;s note&colon;<&sol;strong> It isn&rsquo&semi;t going to be easy for Trump and his team to decide&period; He will either continue to piss off environmental groups and even some members of his administration or his plan to revitalize the coal industry could lose some credibility if the U&period;S&period; stays in the Paris Climate Agreement&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">Pruitt wants to cancel the Paris Climate Agreement signed by Obama&comma; but will the U&period;S&period; really pull out&quest;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;

Exit mobile version