Site icon The Punching Bag Post

GOP Legislation Aims to Lock in Individuals’ Tax Cuts

<p>A three-bill package unveiled this week by House Republicans seeks to make permanent the individual tax cuts outlined in last year&rsquo&semi;s policy overhaul&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>The package&comma; dubbed &ldquo&semi;Tax Reform 2&period;0&comma;&rdquo&semi; also seeks to lock in the new standard deduction&comma; the special deduction for pass-through businesses&comma; and the larger child tax credit&period; Those changes are set to expire in 2025&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p><strong>In terms of retirement savings&comma; the package also seeks to&colon;<&sol;strong><&sol;p>&NewLine;<ul>&NewLine;<li>Remove restrictions on MEPs to help small businesses offer better retirement plans&nbsp&semi;<&sol;li>&NewLine;<li>Eliminate the age cap that prevents Americans older than 70&period;5 from making deductible contributions to a traditional IRA or Roth IRA<&sol;li>&NewLine;<li>Allow parents to take up to &dollar;7&comma;500 from a retirement plan penalty-free within one year of the birth or adoption of a child&nbsp&semi;<&sol;li>&NewLine;<li>Permit parents to use up to &dollar;10&comma;000 from a 529 college savings account to help their kids with student loan payments<&sol;li>&NewLine;<&sol;ul>&NewLine;<p>The bill also calls to establish a new type of savings account that could be used for non-retirement purposes&period; Individuals would be able to contribute up to &dollar;2&comma;500 per year in after-tax earnings&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>House Speaker Paul Ryan &lpar;R-WI&rpar; is hoping to vote on the legislation by the end of the moth&comma; but whether there&rsquo&semi;s significant support for it remains unclear&period;&nbsp&semi;Trump&&num;8217&semi;s approval rating is down and Americans are less than enthusiastic about the 2017 law&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Last year&rsquo&semi;s law has become a hot topic among upcoming races for House and Senate&comma; with a majority of Republicans viewing it as successful&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&ldquo&semi;Under our new system&comma; we&rsquo&semi;re seeing incredible job growth&comma; bigger paychecks&comma; and a tax code that works on behalf of families and American businesses&comma;&rdquo&semi; says Rep&period; Kevin Brady &lpar;R-TX&rpar;&comma; who as Chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee was the principal architect of last year&rsquo&semi;s tax overhaul&period; &ldquo&semi;This legislation is our commitment to the American worker to ensure our tax code remains the most competitive in the world&period;&rdquo&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Democrats&comma; on the other hand&comma; see the changes as disproportionately beneficial to wealthy Americans and corporations&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&ldquo&semi;The first Republican tax law hasn&rsquo&semi;t helped workers get ahead&period; Wages aren&rsquo&semi;t keeping up with inflation&comma; costs for health insurance and prescription drugs and rising&comma; and companies are laying people off and shipping jobs overseas&comma;&rdquo&semi; argues Democrat Richard Neal &lpar;MA&rpar;&period; &ldquo&semi;With this second attempt at major tax legislation&comma; congressional Republicans have doubled down on their initial tax scam and are yet again putting the wealthiest&comma; most privileged Americans ahead of average&comma; hardworking families&period;&rdquo&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>According to estimates from the CBPP&comma; the GOP proposal would cut taxes by about &dollar;32&comma;000 for the wealthiest 1&percnt; and by &dollar;340 for the bottom 60&percnt;&period; By 2028&comma; the bill will have cost the government &dollar;650 billion&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Analysts worry the lost revenue&nbsp&semi;will&nbsp&semi;outweigh any potential economic growth stemming from the cuts and contribute to the deficit&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p><strong>Author&&num;8217&semi;s Note&colon;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;strong>Lawmakers know Tax Reform 2&period;0 won&&num;8217&semi;t survive a Democratic filibuster in the Senate&period;&nbsp&semi;What the proposal is really intended to do is to draw attention to the 2017 law &&num;8211&semi; and the booming economy &&num;8211&semi; at a time when Republicans&nbsp&semi;are worried about losing their majority in the house&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;

Exit mobile version