Site icon The Punching Bag Post

Email Privacy Act Passes House (it's about time!!), Senate Hesitates

<p>Although the Email Privacy Act received a unanimous approval from the US House of Representatives&comma; the bill is already getting some push back from the Senate&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">This act would prohibit law enforcement from obtaining citizens&rsquo&semi; private emails without a warrant&period; Currently&comma; officers are allowed to get this information with only a subpoena&period; This is much easier to obtain because it requires less judicial oversight&period; With law enforcement being mandated to acquire a warrant this would help give citizens&rsquo&semi; more protection&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">Even though there was a 419-0 vote in favor of the act by the House&comma; Sen&period; Charles Grassley&comma; the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee&comma; indicated that the Senate may not support the bill&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">&ldquo&semi;Members of this committee on both sides of the aisle have expressed concerns about the details of this reform&comma; and whether it&rsquo&semi;s balanced to reflect issues raised by law enforcement&comma;&rdquo&semi; said Grassley&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">Evidently&comma; Grassley and some members of the Senate are apprehensive about creating these legal hurdles for law enforcement&period; Those in opposition believe the bill lacks clarity&period; <span style&equals;"mso-spacerun&colon; yes&semi;">&nbsp&semi;<&sol;span><&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">&ldquo&semi;For example&comma; if a warrant&rsquo&semi;s required to obtain email&comma; should the constitutionally-recognized exceptions to the warrant requirement &mdash&semi; such as the email owner&rsquo&semi;s consent &mdash&semi; be fully available for law enforcement as well&quest;&rdquo&semi; said Grassley&period; &ldquo&semi;I plan on taking a close look at the bill that passed the House&comma; and talking with interested stakeholders and members of this committee to try to find a path forward for ECPA reform here in the Senate&period;&rdquo&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">However&comma; many feel strongly about addressing this issue&period; The previous Electronic Communications Privacy Act from 1986&comma; doesn&rsquo&semi;t take into account today&rsquo&semi;s digital developments&comma; such as the web-based email systems that allow communications to be stored in the virtual cloud versus solely on computers&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">There is a similar legislation already in the works by the Senate which has 26 co-sponsors&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">&ldquo&semi;Now that the House has passed this bill by a vote of 419-0&comma; it is time for the Senate to act&period; We urge the Senate to take up and pass this bipartisan&comma; common-sense legislation without delay&comma;&rdquo&semi; said Sen&period; Mike Lee&comma; Utah Republican&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">He hopes with the unanimous success of the Email Privacy Act by the House&comma; this will encourage the Senate to pass this comparable proposal&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;

Exit mobile version