Site icon The Punching Bag Post

Early Draft of Comey Statement Accuses Clinton of Gross Negligence

<p>In an early draft of his final statement on the Clinton email investigation&comma; ex-FBI Director James Comey called Hillary&rsquo&semi;s behavior &ldquo&semi;grossly negligent&period;&rdquo&semi; In his final assessment&comma; delivered July 5th&comma; that phrase had been changed to &ldquo&semi;extremely careless&period;&rdquo&semi;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>As I&rsquo&semi;m sure he knows&comma; the phrase &ldquo&semi;gross negligence&rdquo&semi; is a benchmark used in federal laws when determining whether a certain behavior constitutes a crime&semi; in this case&comma; the loss or removal of classified information&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Comey&rsquo&semi;s first draft recommended against prosecution&comma; but the terminology he uses seems to imply that Hillary broke the law&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&ldquo&semi;There is evidence to support a conclusion that Secretary Clinton&comma; and others&comma; used the private email server in a manner that was grossly negligent with respect to the handling of classified material&comma;&rdquo&semi; reads the draft &lpar;dated May 2nd&comma; 2016&rpar;&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>The draft is one of several documents recently obtained by the Senate&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&ldquo&semi;Although Director Comey&rsquo&semi;s original version of his statement acknowledged that Secretary Clinton had violated the statute prohibiting gross negligence in the handling of classified information&comma; he nonetheless exonerated her&hellip&semi;arguing that this part of the statute should not be enforced&comma;&rdquo&semi; writes Iowa Republican Chuck Grassley&comma; Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>It is unclear who recommended the change in phrasing&comma; but memos show that at least three top FBI officials were involved in helping Comey edit the statement&period;&nbsp&semi;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&ldquo&semi;Apparently&comma; as of May 2016&comma; then-Director Comey and other FBI officials believed the facts fit that gross negligence standard until later edits were made&comma;&rdquo&semi; writes Grassley in a letter to the FBI demanding more information&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Comey&rsquo&semi;s final decision came as a shock and was met with criticism from all sides&period; In his final statement&comma; Comey suggested that Clinton and her aides broke the law but should not be charged because there is no proof of criminal intent&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Comey also insisted the FBI could not find a case in the past that would support bringing criminal charges based on the facts&period; More specifically&comma; the FBI did not find indications of disloyalty to the US&comma; willful mishandling of classified information&comma; or efforts to obstruct justice&period; In other words&comma; Hillary&rsquo&semi;s criminal behavior was just an accident&period;&nbsp&semi;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Comey told Congress last year that he never considered prosecuting Clinton without proof of criminal intent&comma; but the early draft of his statement suggests there may have been disagreement within the FBI about that decision&period; Comey also insisted the FBI would not give Clinton special treatment in the case&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>President Trump fired Comey in May&comma; accusing him of protecting Hillary during the email investigation&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;

Exit mobile version