Site icon The Punching Bag Post

HORIST: Democrats support Trump on China trade … but not the biased media

<p>As promised&comma; President Trump has increased the tariffs on a range of items manufactured in China&period;  The folks on CNN and MSNBC – which includes the usual <em>New York Times<&sol;em> and <em>Washington Post<&sol;em> reporters and bevy of contributors – have remained consistent in their negative spins&period;  Their anti-Trump obsession has risen to ignorance and disinformation&period;  Yep&excl;  Those so-called experts are either so biased that they cannot deal with facts and truth or they are truly … hate to say it … stupid&period;  I suspect a bit of both&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Karine Jean-Pierre&comma;  the spokesperson for MoveOn&period;org&comma; should really be moving on&period;  She contends that the tariffs on goods coming in from China will hurt the American consumer – who&comma; she claims will be paying for the increased costs&period;  And then with a perfectly straight face&comma; she claims that any retaliatory tariffs put on by the Chinese will also hurt the American consumer&period;  How does that work&quest;  Does not seem like you should have it both ways&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>The left also ignores the benefits to a lot of American businesses who will be better able to sell made-in-America products&period;  Part of the rationale for the tariffs is to compensate for China’s unfair competition – such as subsidizing their products to give them even a greater competitive edge&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Virtually all the panelists on the so-called news shows wrongly claim that the United States will get hurt more than China&period;  These ignoramuses did not notice that the first round of tariffs had very little negative impact on the United States and the price of goods&period;  That is because businesses largely absorbed the costs – at least in the first round&period;  If anyone got hit in the U&period;S&period;&comma; it was the stockholders because of lower profits – and that was a very minor hit as we could see by the markets rise to record levels&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>And … while the U&period;S&period; economy continued to boom&comma; the Chinese economy slowed down&period;  That’s right&period;  The tariffs hurt the Middle Kingdom much more than it hurt America&period;  The Trump tariffs provably hurt China more than the U&period;S&period;  That is the leverage we maintain in the tariff battle&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>It is not only a matter of the cost of imports&period;  Tariffs significantly retard China’s huge manufacturing sector&period;  As it becomes more expensive to make and export products from China&comma; they lose a competitive advantage over manufacturers in other countries – where the tariffs do not apply&period;  Any prolonged tariff battle will have factories moving out of China to more advantageous nations – such as Vietnam&comma; Cambodia and Indonesia&period;  Since China is a much&comma; much greater exporting nation than America&comma; they stand to lose disproportionately&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Now&comma; truth be known – and honestly reported – this next round of tariffs will likely cause some price increases that will be felt by consumers&period;  It will not be a bad as Trump critics in the Resistance Movement claim&period;  If the entire cost is passed through to the consumer&comma; the official estimate is a &dollar;726 annual increase for a family of four&period;  That is about &dollar;2 per day&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>This is the kind of personal sacrifice that every American should be willing to make in order to end the extremely damaging trade practices of China&period;  There is no way to address China’s trade practices without America doing a little suffering&period;  It is a small price to pay&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>While the anti-Trump press hypes the &dollar;726 cost as a BIG hit for the average family&comma; it is not&period;  Democrats are hardly in a position to call &dollar;726 a big deal when House Speaker Nancy Pelosi referred to the comparable bonuses that corporations were giving to employees as a result of the new tax law as &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;crumbs&period;”<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>In fact&comma; most of the Democrat leadership – and virtually all the presidential candidates – are supporting the tariffs and Trump’s tough policy toward China&period;  So sayeth Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and Pelosi&period;  They understand that China trade practices are a problem and that there are no other ways to effectively push back&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>The one exception appears to be former Vice President Joe Biden&comma; who has said China is not much of a threat to the United States – a comment disturbingly like   President Obama’s poo-pooing Mitt Romney’s warning that Russia is an existential threat&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Responsible Democrats know that SOMETHING must be done to end China’s unfair trade practices&comma; barriers to investment in China and stealing of intellectual property&period;  Those who criticize Trump have offered no way to address those serious issues – other than the tariffs&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>A second reason Democrat support has to do with the Democrats long ties to organized labor&period;  Protective tariffs have been a hallmark of the labor movement as a means of protecting jobs – preventing them from shifting overseas&period;  It is one of the benefits of tariffs that the Trump critics refuse to acknowledge&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>The tariff issue has caused a split between Democrats and their normally supportive allies in the news media&period;  While Democrats seem to have come to their senses on this one&comma; the media continues to carry out their phony anti-Trump narratives&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>So&comma; there &OpenCurlyQuote;tis&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;

Exit mobile version