Site icon The Punching Bag Post

Conservative SCOTUS could be short-lived

<p>If former Vice President Joe Biden becomes the 46<sup>th<&sol;sup> President of the United States – and if Democrats take control of the Senate – the confirmation of Judge Amy Coney Barrett may be a short-lived victory for the originalists on the Supreme Court&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Democrats are proposing to pack the Court with more justices&period;  Yes&comma; the number of justices is up to Congress and the President&period;  And yes&comma; there were changes in the number in the earliest days of the Republic&period;  But the number settled in at nine in 1869 – and has been there ever since&period;  President Franklin Roosevelt made the only attempt at packing the Court since then – and he was even rebuffed by the Congress he ostensibly controlled&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>We have to keep in mind that Democrats – as the party of a big powerful central government – are never timid about extending the authoritarian concepts of governance&period;  So&comma; what can happen in a future Democrat administration – including control of the Congress&quest;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>The first and most obvious action would be to increase the size of the Supreme Court to 11&comma; 13 or even 15 members&period;  That is not a wild theory&period; A number of the most powerful Democrats in America have called for such action in retaliation for the seating of Barrett&period;  Hardliners like Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi have said that court packing is not off the table in a Biden administration – and these are the folks who would be leading the Congress that would have to pass the legislation&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Biden had been in staunch opposition to the idea in the past &&num;8212&semi; calling it &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;boneheaded&period;&&num;8221&semi;  Currently&comma; he will not repeat his opposition&period;  He now states that he will offer up his opinion after he sees if Barrett is seated or not&period;  Since Barrett is all but certain to be confirmed&comma; Biden’s delay in restating his earlier opposition means that he is now open to the idea – and his hanging it on the outcome of the Senate confirmation hearing is political bs&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Biden promises to state his position prior to the election&comma; but I would not bet on that&period;  He has turned politics into a game of dodgeball&period;  And even if he says he is opposed during the campaign&comma; that does not mean he will not cave to his left-wing base after getting elected&period;  Campaign promises are about as durable as the promise to respect you in the morning&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>The idea of packing the court is not the only threat to a conservative majority&period;  It is likely that the next President will have at least one appointment to the high court – and potentially more if there are two terms&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Justice Stephen Breyer is currently 82 years old and not in the best of health&period;  He could survive another 8 years&comma; but that is very unlikely based on actuary tables&period;  He may also choose to resign at some point&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Replacing Breyer would not be a net gain for the liberal faction since Biden would undoubtedly replace Breyer with another – much younger – liberal&period;  Biden could re-nominate Judge Merrick Garland&comma; but that would bring opposition from the newly empowered left-wing of the Democratic Party&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Garland would be considered a bit too moderate&period;  You have to remember that President Obama selected Garland in the hope of getting him past a Republican Senate&period;  Garland would probably get a number of Republican votes&period;  He has bipartisan respect&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>The next oldest justice is Clarence Thomas at 72&period;  At his age&comma; he could likely outlive a two-term Democrat President – but at that age anything can happen&period;  We saw that with Justice Antonin Scalia&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Thomas has been hinting at retirement in recent years&period;  Whether having a Democrat in the White House would change his thinking is uncertain&period;  Of course&comma; Biden would replace Thomas with a liberal – and restore a 5&sol;4 balance to the Court – still leaning slighting to the right&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>But&comma; if the Democrats succeed in packing the Supreme Court&comma; the liberal activist will then control the Court for generations&period;  Two more liberal justices would make it a 6-to-5 left-leaning Court&period;  Add four and you have an 8-to-5 Court&period;  And 6 more justices would get you an 11-to-5 Court&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Packing the Supreme Court is the road to Hell for the American Democracy&period;  Should Republicans again gain control of the White House and the Senate&comma; they would be within their rights – legally&comma; politically and morally – to create a 21-member Court – or 25&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Packing the Supreme Court is a VERY bad and dangerous idea&period;  Only the power-grabbing Democratic Party could even conceive of such a body blow to the Republic&period;  The very idea that Democrat leaders would even consider such a brutally political retaliation should be enough to vote against them – and not give them even the opportunity to pursue their terrible scheme&period;  Conversely&comma; giving them control of the White House and the Senate would provide them with a sense of license&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>So&comma; there &OpenCurlyQuote;tis&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;

Exit mobile version