Site icon The Punching Bag Post

Chief of Staff Milley should be fired, there I said it!

&NewLine;<p>Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley has become a controversial person in a position where controversy is a serious detriment&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>On the extremes&comma; Milley is either a courageous national hero or a person who has betrayed his duty and trust&period;&nbsp&semi; Those extreme views are the products of those with highly emotional opinions about former President Trump&period;&nbsp&semi; The Trump haters love Milley and the Trump acolytes hate the guy&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>If you discard the hyperbolic views&comma; there is sufficient evidence that Milley has proven to be a person of poor judgment – and it is a lot more than the current controversy surrounding his actions and statements associated with Trump’s presidency&period;&nbsp&semi; The current bruhaha is more of the proverbial straw that breaks the camel’s back&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>This latest controversy stems from a book written by Bob Woodward and Robert Costa entitled &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;Peril&period;”&nbsp&semi; In it&comma; the authors not only describe Milley as a man highly concerned that Trump would launch some fatalistic military action as the product of a depraved mind&period;&nbsp&semi; Milley even called his counterpart in China to assure them that there would be procedures in place that would prevent Trump from launching nuclear missiles on Beijing&period;&nbsp&semi; He demeaned the United States by excusing the current situation by saying that our system is &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;sloppy&period;”&nbsp&semi; His call to his Chinese counterpart after the Capitol Hill riot was disturbingly outside the chain-of-command&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>The book reports that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi made a hysterical call to Milley begging him to protect the nuclear codes&period;&nbsp&semi; He assured her that he would&period;&nbsp&semi; That conversation was inappropriate on both parts – and if Pelosi did not know that the President cannot unilaterally launch the atomic arsenal&comma; she is dangerously ill-informed&period;&nbsp&semi; More likely the call was just a political stunt&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>While judging – and even misjudging – Trump’s state of mind has the subject of a lot of partisan parlor talk&comma; there is virtually no indication that Trump demonstrated the slightest inclination for starting a war&period;&nbsp&semi; Personally&comma; I think Milley was operating with a &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;Doctor Strangelove” fantasy in his head – raising questions about his own mental stability&period;&nbsp&semi;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>The General seemed to be operating on an old canard that that was advanced by the left quite often during the Trump presidency&period;&nbsp&semi; They constantly fearmongered that Trump would &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;push the button” and launch a nuclear holocaust&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>On a couple occasions&comma; I used my commentaries to remind readers that Trump – and no President – has the sole power to launch America’s nuclear arsenal&period;&nbsp&semi; There are too many safeguards … too many people involved … to many &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;buttons” to push&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>When Milley found it necessary to inform his fellow commanders that they MUST follow the procedures … period … he was telling them what they already knew&period;&nbsp&semi; He was admonishing them to play by the rules as if he expected they would not&period;&nbsp&semi; That seems as much a distrust of his military colleagues as it is of the President&period;&nbsp&semi;&nbsp&semi;&nbsp&semi;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>But my headline suggestion that Milley should resign – or be fired – is not just based on this one instance&period;&nbsp&semi; He has been inappropriately outspoken regarding the Commander-in-Chief – the President – on several occasions&period;&nbsp&semi; And each time he was asked to confirm or deny what he was alleged to have said&comma; he suddenly discovered silence – something he should have maintained in the first place&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>He was adamant when advising Trump to postpone his December 2020 deadline to remove all troops from Afghanistan – and that advice was leaked with Milley as the suspected leaker&period;&nbsp&semi; He is also believed to be the source of the Woodward&sol;Costa book&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>An argument could be made that Milley is a show boater more interested in his public image than the restraints of his military duties&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Not all of Milley’s inappropriate behavior was in opposition to hypothetical actions by Trump&period;&nbsp&semi; He also did not know his place when he joined Trump on the trek through Lafayette Square to the steps of St&period; John’s Episcopal Church – that rioters had attempted to burn down the night before&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>It was not so much Trump’s visit – which I opined&comma; at the time&comma; was ill-conceived and badly executed – but that one of the top military leaders would accompany him&period;&nbsp&semi; That was not the role of the Armed Services during an insurrection&period;&nbsp&semi; &lpar;If they label the Capitol Hill riot as an insurrection&comma; we should properly apply that to all those other riots&period;&rpar;&nbsp&semi;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Milley was not there for security but involving himself in a domestic disruption&period;&nbsp&semi; That is the role for the FBI&comma; the local police&comma; and even the National Guard – with some exceptions&period;&nbsp&semi; In that case&comma; Milley was roundly criticized by the left – the same folks currently elevating him to hero status&period;&nbsp&semi; Oh&comma; the hypocrisy&excl;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>This last example of poor judgment should be the career closer for Milley&period;&nbsp&semi; MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough applauds Milley’s actions – including his calls to China on the basis that commanders and diplomats often have direct conversations with their counterparts&period;&nbsp&semi; But with his bias&comma; Scarborough misses the critical point&period;&nbsp&semi; They normally have those conversations in SUPPORT of the American President and American policies – not to undermine the nation’s Chief Executive or cast doubt on his mental state&period;&nbsp&semi;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>In that&comma; Milley was taking a very narrow politically partisan path – one that is totally inappropriate&period;&nbsp&semi; He should go&period;&nbsp&semi; One can recall how General Alexander Haig was lambasted for claiming that he was in charge at the White House when President Reagan was shot&period;&nbsp&semi; Scarborough and the other Milley cheerleaders took a very different position when it came to General Michael Flynn talking to Russian officials&period;&nbsp&semi; More hypocrisy&quest;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>I do not think of Milley as a traitor – as some contend&period;&nbsp&semi; But it is fair to say that his judgment has not been very good on a lot of serious matters – and he has too often crossed the line into the political affairs-of-state&period;&nbsp&semi; President Biden says he has confidence in Milley&period;&nbsp&semi; Maybe so&period;&nbsp&semi; But Milley has damaged his own credibility sufficiently to be replaced – and he should be&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>So&comma; there &OpenCurlyQuote;tis&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;

Exit mobile version