Site icon The Punching Bag Post

Can Trump still win?

<p>In the spirit of &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;anything can happen&comma;” the answer is &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;yes&period;”  But if you look at the odds&comma; the outlook is not so bright for Trump&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Experts on both sides of the political divide tend to agree on one thing – that if the election were today&comma; President Trump would likely lose&period; Based on past elections&comma; being behind at this stage is not a harbinger of what will happen when the votes are counted – including votes that are already being cast in the most extreme early voting states&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>In the meantime&comma; can Trump win over a few more undecideds – and some Democrats&quest;  Can he motivate his people to vote in greater numbers than the Democrats&quest;  Both efforts are important because there are officially more registered Democrats in America than Republicans&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Republicans can do well nationally because many people register as Democrats – and vote for local Democrats – but lean Republican in national elections&period;  In the 1980s&comma; they became known as &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;Reagan Democrats&period;”  In 2016&comma; they could have been called &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;Trump Democrats&period;”<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Yes&comma; it is possible for Trump to win re-election&comma; BUT the odds continue to shift against him&period;  Getting the few undecideds to come his way – and to attract a significant number of registered Democrats – Trump would have to change the current trajectory&period;  In a normal year&comma; that is very doable&comma; but this is not a normal year&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Trump has two major challenges to overcome&period;  It is safe to say that no President in American history – not even the much-maligned Abraham Lincoln – has had so much of the national media so vehemently and maliciously opposed to them&period;  The most powerful print and electronic media outlets have undertaken an unprecedented partisan campaign to oust Trump&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Their news reports&comma; their documentaries&comma; their town hall meetings and their feature stories have all been corrupted – serving as massive commercials and infomercials on behalf of the Democratic Party and the left-wing agenda&period;  Whatever one thinks of the Trump presidency&comma; they should be deeply disturbed by the surrender of a free press to an elitist political faction with big government Big Brother authoritarian instincts&period;  They are using Trump’s pugnacious personality to attain a tighter grip on America&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Unfortunately&comma; Trump is providing them with ammunition&period;  And that is the second obstacle to Trump’s gaining the lead in the coming month&period;  It has always been about the Trump personality – those character traits that keep Trump voters like me wincing and ultimately holding our noses as we cast a ballot based on the all-important broader issues that separate the political parties&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>One can dissect the various flaws in the Trump personality and character&comma; but it can be summed up by a catch phrase that came out of the old – almost ancient – &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;Honeymooners” show starring Jackie Gleason as Ralph Kramden&period;  Often when Kramden screwed up with his over-the-top belligerent personality &lpar;sound familiar&quest;&rpar;&comma; he would yell out&comma; &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;I HAVE A B-I-I-G MOUTH&excl;”<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Unlike Kramden&comma; Trump has never confessed to his own screw-ups in such a manner – but they have mostly been due to his B-I-I-G MOUTH and his willingness to shoot it off as often as possible in front of cameras&period;  As a result&comma; the national media is running his more inaccurate and outrageous comments on continuous loop&period;  Recently&comma; Joe Scarborough&comma; of MSNBC’s &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;Morning Joe&comma;” ran repetitions of Trump’s most self-damaging comments for an entire show&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>In the first year of Trump’s presidency&comma; it was my public recommendation that he limit his exposure to the new media&period;  Even then&comma; it was obvious to me – and many others who made similar recommendations – that he would not be well served by presenting himself to the reporters so often&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Trump has provided the press with personal on-the-run briefings on an almost daily bases&period;  No matter how many times he said he distrusted the media – and called them &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;fake news” – and no matter how unfairly and brutally they treated him&comma; Trump would give them access and more grist for those mendacious narratives emanating from the media mill&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Because Trump did not take the advice of people like me&comma; he provided the Democrats and the media a library of inept&comma; inaccurate and head-scratching statements – even legitimate comments that may have changed as events developed &&num;8212&semi; that are now being used against him&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Today&comma; Trump faces a radical left Democratic Party&comma; an elitist new media and a powerful bureaucratic establishment that are united and obsessed with removing Trump and Republicans from office at all costs &lpar;including promoting street violence&rpar; in order to go back to the business of growing an ever-more powerful central government in Washington&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Trump could have won that battle – and maybe still can&period;  But the odds in his favor are diminishing&period;  What can he now say or do to change the current trajectory&quest;  I do believe there is a way – but I am increasingly pessimistic that Trump can find it or will even look for it&period;  I hope I am wrong&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>So&period; There &OpenCurlyQuote;tis&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;

Exit mobile version