Site icon The Punching Bag Post

California’s Racial Reparations Plan: An $800 Billion Dollar Farce?

&NewLine;<p>The California government has recommended the redistribution of hundreds of billions of dollars as racial reparations&period; The committee has suggested that the state pays cash to black Americans who claim to be descendants of slaves&period; The committee claims that the state government was complicit in the enslavement of blacks in southern states&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>They suggest payments of &dollar;2&comma;352 for each year slavery descendants lived in California from 1971 to 2020&period; They also recommend payments of &dollar;3&comma;366 for each year they lived in the state between 1933 and 1977 when housing discrimination allegedly occurred&comma; as well as &dollar;13&comma;619 for each year they were a California resident&period; All of this is to compensate for health disparities between blacks and whites&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>The total cost could be as much as &dollar;1&period;2 million per person and &dollar;800 billion overall&period; However&comma; only descendants of slaves would be eligible for these reparations&period; The committee&&num;8217&semi;s plan has some arbitrary distinctions as they have excluded many groups of minorities&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Black immigrants&comma; Japanese Americans whose ancestors were put in camps during World War II&comma; Chinese Americans who worked on the intercontinental railroad&comma; and Native Americans who were pushed off their land by settlers are not eligible for reparations&period; The restriction to slavery descendants looks like an attempt to overcome likely legal challenges&comma; as the Constitution’s equal protection clause prohibits government policies that discriminate based on broad racial classifications&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>To confirm who is a descendant of a slave&comma; a special agency would determine eligibility based on genealogical research&period; With so much cash at stake&comma; it is predicted that litigation will ensue&period; The committee also recommends that the state adopt a laundry list of left-wing policies to remedy racial disparities&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>These include rent control in minority neighborhoods&comma; free college and a guaranteed income for slavery descendants&comma; and single-payer health care&period; The panel also suggests repealing a 1996 state constitutional amendment that banned racial preferences&comma; which voters reaffirmed in a 2020 referendum&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>The California panel&&num;8217&semi;s recommendations have been met with controversy&period; Reparations for slavery have been criticized as it requires Americans who played no part in slavery to pay for the sins of the past&period; A moral question is why Americans who played no part in either slavery or Jim Crow should pay for the sins of the past&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>If the reparations committee wants to make amends for bad policy&comma; other suggestions have been made&period; These include issues such as teacher tenure protections&comma; lack of school choice&comma; zoning restrictions&comma; and the state’s de facto decriminalization of drug use and shoplifting in 2014&period; These progressive policies increase racial and income disparities&comma; but they are off the reparations list&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>The proposed plan for racial reparations in California is not only unfair&comma; but also ludicrous&period; The arbitrary distinctions made by the committee exclude many groups of minorities who have also suffered discrimination and injustices throughout history&period; Furthermore&comma; the proposal would cost an astronomical amount of money&comma; with only descendants of slaves eligible for the payouts&period; The laundry list of left-wing policies suggested by the panel seems to be an attempt to manipulate the situation for political gain&period; <&sol;p>&NewLine;

Exit mobile version