Site icon The Punching Bag Post

'CalExit' – Is the California Secession Movement for Real?

<p>They&rsquo&semi;re calling it &ldquo&semi;Calexit&rdquo&semi; &ndash&semi; the miniscule chance that California will decide to secede from the US following Donald Trump&rsquo&semi;s election&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Despite several valiant efforts before the Civil War&comma; no state has ever legally seceded from the US &lpar;if anything&comma; I thought Texas would be the first to do it&rpar;&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>The Golden State voted overwhelmingly in favor of Hillary Clinton&comma; and many liberal Californians are now questioning their place in the nation&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&ldquo&semi;Right now California is the polar opposite of what is going on politically&comma; culturally&comma; and in some cases economically in Donald Trump&rsquo&semi;s America&comma;&rdquo&semi; says political analyst Sherry Bebitch Jeffe&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Breaking up the US is &ldquo&semi;an inconceivable thought&comma;&rdquo&semi; argues Democratic strategist and California resident Darry Sragow&period; &ldquo&semi;I don&rsquo&semi;t see how Californians get to the point where a majority of us want to secede&hellip&semi; I cannot envision a circumstance under which the rest of the country would even think about this for a nanosecond&period;&rdquo&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>But that possibility is exactly what a group of secessionists called &ldquo&semi;Yes California&rdquo&semi; is considering&comma; and they have already proposed a future ballot measure that would ask registered voters whether California should become its own country&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>The two-year-old grassroots movement went from 500 Twitter followers before the election to more than 16&comma;000 afterwards&period;&nbsp&semi;They argue that Californians pay too much in federal taxes &lpar;&dollar;370 billion annually&rpar; and could put that money to good use fixing the state&&num;8217&semi;s deteriorating&nbsp&semi;infrastructure&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>It would require 585&comma;407 signatures to place a Calexit option on the November 2018 ballot&period; After that&comma;&nbsp&semi;two-thirds of Congress would have to agree to an amendment allowing secession&semi; at least 38 states would have to ratify it&period; &nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&ldquo&semi;That is less likely to happen than Donald Trump appointing Hillary Clinton secretary of state&comma;&rdquo&semi; jokes UC Hastings College of Law Professor David Levine&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>With a population of over 38 million&comma; California is an economic and tourism powerhouse that the feds won&rsquo&semi;t want to relinquish&period; If California became a separate nation&comma; it would be the sixth largest economy in the world&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Yes California already has 13&comma;000 volunteers willing to collect the 500&comma;000&plus; signatures they would need to qualify for the ballot&comma; but&nbsp&semi;Sragow points out that the organization has little chance of success without serious financial support&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&ldquo&semi;Operationally qualifying for the ballot is difficult and ordinarily involves the expenditure of large amounts of money in the seven figures&period; That&rsquo&semi;s a hurdle that very few grass-roots movements clear&period;&rdquo&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>San Jose State Political Science Professor Larry Gertson agrees that secession just isn&rsquo&semi;t feasible&period; &ldquo&semi;This movement has a small core&period; It makes news because it&rsquo&semi;s different&period; It would be extraordinary for it to go much farther than it&rsquo&semi;s gone&&num;8230&semi; All we have to do is take a look at the value of the state&period; It would be an incredible loss&period; California is a very robust state for a reason and it has to do with all these resources here both man-made and natural&period;&rdquo&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>A recent study by National Priorities Project found that California receives &dollar;193 billion annually in federal benefits including food stamps&comma; Social Security payments&comma; Pell grans&comma; and unemployment insurance&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>The state&rsquo&semi;s annual share of the federal defense budget is &dollar;72 billion&period; How much would the state be willing to spend on a new military &ndash&semi; not to mention its own social security program&comma; postal service&comma; and diplomatic corps&quest;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&ldquo&semi;The transition alone would be just sort of mind-boggling&comma;&rdquo&semi; says National Priorities Project research director Lindsay Koshgarian&period; &ldquo&semi;The sheer bureaucracy that California would have to create for itself is really easy to under-appreciate&period; There are all these federal workers&comma; and the vast majority of them really do something&period;&rdquo&semi;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Yes California VP Ruiz Evans knows he&rsquo&semi;s aiming high&period; &ldquo&semi;Our goal is to get to a tipping point&period; Our point is to prove there&rsquo&semi;s a market&comma;&rdquo&semi; he said&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p><strong>Editor&&num;8217&semi;s note&colon;<&sol;strong> Obviously this is farfetched and poorly thought out&comma; but crazier things have happened&period; If it is true they are only lacking financial backing&comma; look for the effort to gain steam&period; Somebody will step up&comma; could be Liberals&comma; could be Conservative&comma; could be the Chinese&comma; the Russians or someone in the Middle East&period; Stay tuned folks&excl;<&sol;p>&NewLine;

Exit mobile version