Site icon The Punching Bag Post

Biden Took Work Home From the Office

&NewLine;<p>If you really want to see America’s national political divide&comma; just check out the response to the story that President Biden took a number of top-secret documents home – and kept them for years&period; It is certainly ironic that Biden would be caught with purloined records in his files after responding so sanctimoniously to President Trump&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>If you follow the right-leaning news&comma; you will see equivalency between the Trump and Biden documents issues&period;&nbsp&semi; If you follow the left-leaning news&comma; the differences get all the gravitas&period;&nbsp&semi; In fact&comma; both sides are correct&period;&nbsp&semi; It is the omission of balance – recognizing the validity of the opposing argument – that is the problem&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<h2 class&equals;"wp-block-heading"><strong>The Case Against Biden&nbsp&semi;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;strong><&sol;h2>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Like Trump&comma; Biden is guilty of possessing top-secret documents that he had no legal right to have in his possession&period;&nbsp&semi; They were removed from the White House Illegally&period;&nbsp&semi; The argument that those secret documents were no longer in secure places – as required by law – is valid in both cases<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>The fact that Trump had more documents in his possession is irrelevant&period;&nbsp&semi; Bank robbery is not determined by the amount of cash the thieves got away with&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>As in the Trump case&comma; the question arises as to whether there are other purloined documents in any of many locations controlled by Biden – the archives at University of Pennsylvania and University of Delaware … his home … or even in the White House&period;&nbsp&semi; Although&comma; I would argue that if they were at the White House&comma; the documents are still in the government possession&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>There is still the question of why Biden had those documents&period;&nbsp&semi; Based on media reports&comma; there is another layer of suspicion&period;&nbsp&semi; It seems the documents were related to intelligence about Ukraine&period;&nbsp&semi; Maybe documents that would shed unfavorable light on Hunter Biden’s activities&quest;&nbsp&semi; Yes&comma; that is pure speculation&comma; but a question that needs answering&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>The situation with Biden can arguably be mitigated by the fact that his lawyers discovered the documents and immediately returned them to the government&period;&nbsp&semi; One can legitimately wonder why there was a three-month delay in public notification of Biden’s possession&period;&nbsp&semi; Since the discovery was prior to the 2022 Midterm Election&comma; the speculation that the withholding of the information from the public was politically motivated&period;&nbsp&semi; More legitimate questions&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Ionically&comma; one of the more damning observations regarding Biden came from Democrat strategist David Axelrod&period;&nbsp&semi; Appearing on CNN&comma; he underscored that EVERYONE in the White House was advised on the handling of government documents – especially top-secret information&period;&nbsp&semi; Axelrod left no wiggle room for Biden to plead ignorance&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>While Biden’s political friends say&comma; &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;nothing to see here&comma;” the fact remains that the situation is worthy of investigation&period;&nbsp&semi; Attorney General Merrick Garland wasted no time in assigning the case to the Chicago federal prosecutor&period;&nbsp&semi; It seems he wanted to avoid the appearance of political prejudice since he assigned the case to a Trump appointee&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>I see this as the proverbial political sweater with a number of loose threads to be pulled to see what unravels&period;&nbsp&semi; Biden’s claimed of cluelessness is not credible&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<h2 class&equals;"wp-block-heading"><strong>The Case Against Trump<&sol;strong><&sol;h2>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>The difference is not the nature of the &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;crime” – if that is what it is determined to be in either case&period;&nbsp&semi; Trump and Biden both had documents allegedly illegally removed from federal government custody without permission&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>The fact that Trump resisted the return of those documents is a significant difference&period;&nbsp&semi; There are accusations that Trump was never forthcoming concerning an inventory of documents he possessed – and accusations that he was attempting to hide some in the face of government requests and orders to return them&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Those actions resulted in a raid on Trump’s residence at Mar-a-Lago – and the retrieval of hundreds of Documents&period;&nbsp&semi; There is also the possibility – POSSIBILITY – of obstructions charges&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>None of that&comma; however&comma; absolves Biden of illegal possession of those top-secret documents&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<h2 class&equals;"wp-block-heading" id&equals;"h-summary"><strong>Summary<&sol;strong><&sol;h2>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>What we have are two distinct cases to be investigated&period;&nbsp&semi; Drawing an equivalency is a political game – with no meaning legally&period;&nbsp&semi; In that arena&comma; the advantage goes to Trump&period;&nbsp&semi; His primary political adversary now faces the same issue – and Biden has egg on his face for his harsh attacks on Trump on the very same issue&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>If you accept the significant differences in Trump and Biden cases&comma; you have to consider the General Petraeus case&period;&nbsp&semi; That case is more like the Biden situation&period;&nbsp&semi; If you recall&comma; Petraeus took home some secret documents to aid in the preparation of his book&period;&nbsp&semi; He wound up paying a &dollar;40&comma;000 fine and served out a 2-year probationary sentence&period;&nbsp&semi; It should be noted&comma; however&comma; that Petraeus was accused of lying to the FBI&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Trump may also gain an important second benefit from the Biden case&period;&nbsp&semi; Even though Biden appears to be in less legal jeopardy&comma; can the Justice Department simply walk away from the Biden case and take a hard line on Trump&period;&nbsp&semi; That would &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;appear” to be politically motivated – and Garland does not like that sort of appearance&period;&nbsp&semi; Since he is not likely to throw the book at Biden&comma; Garland may decide to go easier on Trump&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>More often than not&comma; these document cases are handled as civil cases – or will simply end when documents are returned&period;&nbsp&semi; No charges were ever filed against disgraced Congressman Anthony Weiner or his wife&comma; Huma Abedin&comma; who had secret State Department documents on their personal home computer – obtained when Abedin was a top aide to Secretary of state Hillary Clinton&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Of course&comma; Biden cannot be charged while President&comma; but that may end on January 20&comma; 2025&period;&nbsp&semi; It would really be ironic if both Biden and Trump were running for President to avoid a criminal charge for the same offenses&period;&nbsp&semi; But that is a long shot&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>So&comma; there &OpenCurlyQuote;tis&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>POSTSCRPT&colon;&nbsp&semi; The contents of the Biden government papers have just been revealed&comma; and the Lincoln Library wants the documents back&period;<br><br><&sol;p>&NewLine;

Exit mobile version