
<p>The media is calling Biden a wartime President. ; There are two reasons he is not. ; That appellation usually applies to a President in office with the country was in a war. ; At the moment we are not officially at war with anyone – at least not a shooting war.</p>



<p>It would be more realistic to call Biden “an appeasement President” or maybe “a war losing President.” ; ;</p>



<p>Biden is a continuation of President Obama’s oxymoronic policy of leading from behind. ; Biden was a staunch supporter of the policies that prematurely pulled troops out of Iraq – which resulted in the horrific rise of ISIS and the creation of the first califate in centuries. ; It resulted in the horrific deaths of tens of thousands of people. ; Fortunately, the Trump administration crushed it.</p>



<p>Biden was an advocate of the withdrawal of American forces in Iraq..</p>



<p>Biden was part of the Obama policies that promoted insurrection against Syrian despot Bashar al Asaad and then walked away – triggering the worst human, and most deadly, human migration in modern times (until Ukraine) and turning Syria into a durable anti-American state ;</p>



<p>Biden was a key player in the American reaction – or lack thereof &#8212; to Russia’s invasion and seizing of the Crimea portion of Ukraine. ; He was fully supportive of the Obama policy of letting Putin have the Crimea. ; There were not even sanctions.</p>



<p>And next, this so-called wartime President surrendered in Afghanistan in the worst possible way at the worst possible time. ; That is now a second nation on the global that is firmly in the hands of American enemies thanks to the Biden approach.</p>



<p>And now Biden is engaging in a variation of the leading-from-behind policy. ; He has been engaged for the past year in his own too-little-too-late policy regarding Ukraine. ; Although he promised he would “cripple” Russia if the Madman of Moscow invaded. ; Biden admitted later that he did not expect the threat of sanctions to stop the invasion. ; He was right for once.</p>



<p>Instead of hitting Putin prior to the invasion – as many experts suggested – he waited. ; Biden said that once Russian troops entered Ukraine, Putin would be hit with maximum sanctions. ; That was also not true. ; He has been slowly increasing the sanctions reluctantly. ; Biden seems to have been forced by events and public opinion to increase the sanctions on Russia – again too little and too late.</p>



<p>And now Biden is being cornered into cutting off purchases of Russian oil by the members of his own Party in Congress. ; Both Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi – and Republicans in Congress – led on that issue.</p>



<p>What most people mean by a “wartime President” is that leader who inspires a nation – the world – behind a WINNING strategy – one that creates a coalition of the good that ultimately defeats the evil. ; That is not Biden. ; He acquiesces. ;</p>



<p>In the case of Afghanistan, Biden undermined the good and gave way to the evil. ; Remember &#8230; none of our allied nations approved of the Biden surrender – but with America surrendering, they had no choice.</p>



<p>While Biden can boast of decades of experience in domestic and world affairs, he is self-victimized by a lack of a fundamental core understanding of the role of free-world leadership in a dangerously divided world – and a moral commitment to good over evil. ; Under his administration, the forces of evil are winning – almost consistently. ; ;</p>



<p>There are times, it seems that Biden is incapable of seeing any enemies of mankind and human freedom other than fossil fuel. ; ;</p>



<p>So, there ‘tis.</p>

Biden Is No Wartime President
