<p>According to the <em>Washington Post</em>, Attorney General Jeff Sessions will soon be launching an investigation into the various White House leaks that have plagued Trump during the past six months. ;</p>
<p>These leaks seemed to have &ldquo;emanated from the Justice Department and various intelligence agencies,&rdquo; reports <em>Politico.</em> ;</p>
<p>News of the investigation comes after newly-appointed White House Press Secretary Anthony Scaramucci announced he was ready to &ldquo;fire everybody&rdquo; to stop information leaks from the press office. ;</p>
<p>President Trump has grown increasingly critical of Sessions in recent days, badmouthing him on Twitter and complaining that his decision to recuse himself from the Russia investigation was &ldquo;unfair.&rdquo; ;</p>
<p>&ldquo;Jeff Sessions takes the job, gets into the job, recuses himself, which frankly I think is very unfair to the president,&rdquo; said Trump. &ldquo;How do you take a job and then recuse yourself? &#8230;It&rsquo;s extremely unfair &ndash; and that&rsquo;s a mild word &ndash; to the president.&rdquo;  ;</p>
<p>On Tuesday, Trump told reports that Sessions needs to be &ldquo;much tougher on leaks in the intelligence agencies that are leaking like they never have before.&rdquo; ;</p>
<p>On Wednesday, Scaramucci confirmed Sessions plans to do so: &ldquo;I think he has got a plan that he&rsquo;s put together, and at some point, I don&rsquo;t know if it will be today, tomorrow or next week, he will announce that plan.&rdquo; ;</p>
<p>Meanwhile, the Deep State is said to be in possession of intelligence intercepts that suggest Sessions had &ldquo;substantive&rdquo; discussions on &ldquo;campaign-related matters&rdquo; with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak before he was appointed Attorney General. ;</p>
<p>The Deep State did not provide actual documents, preferring instead to verbally describe the documents to the <em>Post</em>. All sources are anonymous. ;</p>
<p>In March, Sessions said that he did not have &ldquo;meetings with Russian operatives or Russian intermediaries about the Trump campaign&rdquo; and met with Kislyak only in his capacity as a Senator. The intercepts seem to contradict these statements, but it is unlikely the intercepts are accurate. ;</p>
<p>The DOJ did not comment on the story due to lack of reliable sourcing. ;</p>
<p>&ldquo;Obviously I cannot comment on the reliability of what anonymous sources describe in a wholly uncorroborated intelligence intercept that the <em>Washington Post</em> has not seen and that has not been provided to me,&rdquo; said DOJ spokesperson Sarah Isgur Flores.</p>