Select Page

Former FBI Agent Claims Mueller Lied to the Senate Intelligence Committee

Former FBI Agent Claims Mueller Lied to the Senate Intelligence Committee

As special counsel Robert Mueller builds a case against the former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn, a former longtime FBI agent is claiming that Mueller was dishonest with the Senate while he worked under him from 2005 to 2008.

Chuck Marler worked in the FBI’s Special Surveillance Group, but ultimately left to “get away from the corruption of certain members of the FBI management.”

Big League Politics released the full statement where Marler said that Mueller and other FBI management members “deceived” the Senate Select Committee and also “intimidated and bullied” the U.S. Office of Personnel Management.  

Marlers gives a thorough account of how Mueller lead with dishonesty while employed by the Obama administration. 

“Mueller and individuals in FBI Management were continually notified by members of the SSG that their surveillance activities were growing way beyond the scope of their operational plan before Congress and that their safety was at stake. After 911, the program had expanded at a rapid pace.  The members of the SSG were happy to take on the vastly growing surveillances throughout the country but they wanted better protection, better compensation and more clear duties defined through Congress.  Mueller and FBI Management continually ignored their cries for help. 

In the Summer of 2005, two FBI employees in the SSG Program wrote a letter and mailed it to every member of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI).  The two FBI employees were notified by Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison’s office of receipt of the letter.  Those same two FBI employees and two additional employees wrote another letter and mailed it to the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM).  That opening letter to the OPM was very generic because their work is considered Secret due to their undercover status conducting Counter Terrorism and Counter Intelligence work.  The OPM letter only listed their names, job title, office and generic nature of their complaint.  The letter to the SSCI was more informative due to SSCI’s level of classification regarding U.S. Intelligence. 

The two employees involved in the SSCI letter were informed by staff at Senator Hutchison’s Office of Mueller’s response to the letter which the two employees knew the response was not truthful.  OPM opened a routine complaint/inquiry based on the letter that they received from the four FBI employees.  The OPM officer that had the misfortune to be assigned the job, sent an initiation letter to FBI Headquarters to gain security clearance to begin her assessment.  She was immediately threatened with arrest by FBI agents.  Subsequently and because of the letter, the four FBI employees were threatened with arrest, imprisonment, raids of their residences and loss of their job. Although better security and more definded operational duties eventually were hammered out, it was no thanks to Mueller. The four employees and their squad supervisor were overtly and covertly punished, then and to this day.

The information I have relayed to you is important but in the current climate of intimidation of whistle blowers and continued dishonest activity of some in the FBI, I have been reluctant to relay in this much detail.  The reason (beyond discuss with Mueller and Comey) that I inform you now is because I know you have contacts with Judicial Watch. Judicial Watch my benefit from FIOA request regarding communications Mueller and FBI Management had with Senator Hutchinson’s Office and the OPM during 2005 thru 2008.  I know the OPM Officer, the FBI employees and their supervisor because obviously I was one of the four employees.  I do not suspect the gathering of evidence to Mueller’s dishonesty regarding this matter will be easy to obtain because of the cloud of secrecy it entails but I pray Mueller will answer for his actions.”

This new information begs the question, is Mueller even more dishonest than we thought?

This statement isn’t helping the mounting case that Mueller’s investigation isn’t credible or unbiased. 

Mueller has been criticized for building a bias case about Russia being allegedly involved in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Recently, multiple connections have been discovered between his team and Hillary Clinton.

Not to mention, several of the attorneys on Mueller’s team have donated thousands to Democrats.  

His investigation has been referred to as contaminated following the recent reports a member assisting with the investigation, Peter Strzok was anti-Trump.

“Recent reports suggest that Peter Strzok, the deputy head of counterintelligence at the FBI, was working on Mueller’s investigation until he was removed during the summer, after Mueller discovered he had exchanged text messages critical of Trump with a lawyer assigned to the probe, with whom he was involved romantically. Strzok, it turns out, was also responsible for editing then-FBI Director James B. Comey’s description of Hillary Clinton’s handling of classified emails, reportedly softening the language from describing Clinton’s actions as “grossly negligent” to “extremely careless,” write The Washington Post.

Author’s note: It’s important to point out that major media outlets have yet to report on this Marler’s statement, but we did some digging and Chuck Marler was really a former FBI employee who worked for the bureau for 16 years. He seems like a legitimate source.

Editor’s note: The mainstream media won’t be interested, this story won’t be vetted, verified or covered.

About The Author

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *