Trying to keep up with the tangled web of the Democrat Party, Clinton, the Obama Administration, and Trump is as complicated as a conspiracy theorist’s wall. Pictures of innuendos, half-truths, and lies all connected by bits of yarn. Trump has been under fire since he got to the White House from the Democrats who want to tear down his presidency by painting him as a Russian Double Agent.
To make matters even more ridiculous, now that he has all but been vindicated, he’s now the subject (or is he? Lord knows with the media’s track record) of an obstruction of justice investigation being under taken by Hilary Clinton donors.
Yes, I am sure it will be a by the books, only the facts type of investigation. With all this stuff going on, it’s easy for people to check out and become lost in the complexity, which is part of the purpose of all of this. But now, the tables have shifted a little bit since the sworn testimony of James Comey, former FBI Direction, who stated that Obama Administration’s Attorney General Loretta Lynch told Comey on several occasions not to call Clinton’s Investigation an investigation, but rather a “review”. This has a lot of people wondering, who was really obstructing justice? As a result, the Senate Judiciary Committee has called on Lynch to answer for this and other testimonies.
The Senate Judiciary Committee sent a bipartisan letter to Lynch answer a series of questions was signed by two Republicans (Sen. Chuck Grassley R-IA & Sen Lindsey Graham R-SC) and two Democrats (Sen Diane Feinstein D-CA & Sheldon Whitehouse D-RI). There are multiple things that the Committee wishes to gather clarity on involving Lynch and the investigation (when the FBI is involved it’s an investigation not an internal review) of Hilary Clinton’s private email server. There are three bits of information that have people rubbing their chins.
First is Lynch’s actions during the investigation itself. She continually tried to downplay the whole thing and insist that Clinton did not break any rules and that she wasn’t under investigation. This is combined with other actions the Attorney General committed during this time-period. She put pressure on Comey not to call it an investigation to the media, thus showing her hand in her premeditated decision not to hold Clinton accountable to the law. This is according to Comey’s sworn testimony.
Comey also stated that he was worried that Lynch was unable to remain impartial during the investigation. I can’t imagine why. This is the woman who basically turned a blind eye while Clinton not only deleted the server but professionally and expensively bleached the system to ensure no one could piece it together. She also did nothing when the Clinton campaign literally destroyed computers and phones with bloody hammers!
Imagine for a second in the course of this Trump/Russia Investigation if anyone, I mean anyone who so much as met Trump at a dinner party, destroyed their phone with a hammer in the middle of an investigation. You’d have lynch mobs! But remember, rules are different for Democrats.
The second bit is much more public and it was Lynch’s meeting with Bill Clinton at the tarmac of an airport during the investigation. Not long after that, Lynch announced that the investigation was closed. What was said on the airplane? No one knows really. They claim they were talking about their kids….. for close to 45 minutes. The optics alone were damaging but anyone knows that when the prosecutor and the defendant’s husband are chummy, it is considered a conflict of interest and that person is no longer qualified to lead the investigation. She refused to recuse herself, like Sessions did even though he knew he didn’t do anything wrong and was discovered he did nothing wrong, but to avoid the appearance of conflict. That’s what impartial parties do. Lynch wasn’t impartial.
The last bit of evidence comes from an unconfirmed report of hacked emails from the DNC where an operative assured the Clinton Campaign that Lynch would not allow the investigation to go too far. Though this is the most damning evidence, its lack of backing has it sitting in limbo. It is still being looked into.
Here’s the bottom line: the Democrats are worst kind of hypocrites whose truths are based on what they need them to be rather than what they actually are. Take a second and swap Trump and Clinton. Imagine if Trump had a government contract and kept government documents at Mar-a-Lago on a private server in his bathroom.
When it was discovered, he deleted them.
When asked for the devices, he smashed them with hammers.
When we turned to the Attorney General to get the bottom of it, Sessions assured Trump it wouldn’t go too far and put pressure on the FBI not to let it go too far.
Would CNN sit by and buy that? Would MSNBC or any other Mainstream Media Outlets? Consider that Trump can’t even burp without saying “excuse me” without one of these outlets making it a scandal. So why are they silent on Hilary and Lynch? Maybe because, like all of us in the real-world sense, they are not news agencies, but propaganda firms.
I hope Lynch gets grilled, but don’t count on it having the same media circus as Trump’s investigation. No 9:00 am Happy Hours in DC for Lynch testimonies.